FQPPI Federal Question Period Productivity Index
| | FR | Est. 12,026 HE | |
Question Period — Wednesday, October 19, 2022 ← Sessions

Question Period

Wednesday, October 19, 2022 · Parliament 44-1 · Sitting #113
FQPPI
4.2 / 10
Avg Question
5.5
Avg Answer
3.2
41 exchanges (3 gov. backbench)

Session overview

  • Cost-of-living dominated Question Period, with Conservative members repeatedly demanding the Prime Minister cancel plans to triple the carbon tax on groceries, gas and home heating; Trudeau defended the price on pollution and pivoted to the GST credit top-up, dental care and rental support as relief measures.
  • The ArriveCAN app became a procurement accountability flashpoint, with Poilievre pressing the Prime Minister to publicly name all subcontractors who received money from the $54-million contract; Trudeau defended the spending as pandemic safety spending but did not commit to releasing the full list.
  • Public safety was raised in the context of the murder of Constable Yang in Burnaby and a reported 32% increase in violent crime over seven years; the Prime Minister responded by emphasizing gun control measures including the assault weapons ban and handgun freeze rather than directly addressing the crime wave.
  • Blanchet raised a $28-million sole-source contract linked to land near chemin Roxham and alleged racial discrimination against francophone African students in the immigration system; Trudeau offered general assurances without naming the landowner or the contract value.
  • The House paid tribute to former NDP MP and Deputy Speaker Bill Blaikie, with tributes from all parties highlighting his 29 years of service, his role in shaping the Canada Health Act, his founding of Robbie Burns nights on the Hill, and his social gospel convictions; his son, the member for Elmwood—Transcona, delivered a personal tribute.
  • The Bloc raised concerns about the invocation of the Emergencies Act during the truckers convoy, questioning whether it was justified or politically motivated; Trudeau defended the use as responsible, restrained and time-limited, and pointed to the ongoing public inquiry.
Best exchange
Exchange #37 ↔ Ms. Lisa Hepfner
1.0

Trudeau announced that the government had that day launched consultations on eliminating the use of replacement workers during strikes and lockouts, a specific new policy action disclosed during the exchange.

Best question
Exchange #26 Mr. Pierre Paul-Hus
8.5

Paul-Hus cites a specific committee hearing, a specific sole-source contract, the location (Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle), the amount (28 millions de dollars), a Radio-Canada source confirming the Prime Minister's refusal to disclose, and asks two precise questions: who is the owner and what is the contract value.

Worst answer
Exchange #26 Justin Trudeau
2.0

Asked directly who owns the land near chemin Roxham and how much taxpayers are paying for it, Trudeau responded entirely about the integrity of the immigration system and welcoming asylum seekers, without addressing the ownership, the contract value or the procurement process in any way.

Outstanding questions

  • Poilievre asked the Prime Minister to commit to supplying the House with a full list of all subcontractors who received money under the $54-million ArriveCAN contract — no commitment was made and no names were provided.
  • Paul-Hus asked who owns the land at the entrance to chemin Roxham and exactly how much the Government of Canada is paying for it under the contract — Trudeau refused to answer either element.
  • Blanchet asked the Prime Minister to explain why francophone African students are being discriminated against on a racial basis by his government's immigration system — Trudeau offered only a general non-discrimination assurance without explaining the specific disparity.
  • Singh asked whether the Prime Minister agrees with the Bank of Canada's discouraging employers from increasing wages to keep up with inflation — Trudeau praised union leaders and collective bargaining but did not answer the specific question about the Bank of Canada's position on wages.
  • Morrice asked the Prime Minister to commit to funding the Canada disability benefit by budget 2023 — Trudeau acknowledged the importance of the issue and referenced the legislation but made no specific commitment to a funding timeline.
Public Safety
#1
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
5.5

Poilievre asks what policy changes the Prime Minister will make to end the violent crime wave, referencing the murder of Constable Yang.

The question references a specific murdered officer and a pattern of police killings but the ask — 'what changes will the Prime Minister make' — is broad and compound rather than tied to a specific policy commitment.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Monsieur le Président, c'est avec tristesse que nous exprimons notre amour et notre soutien à la famille de l'agente Yang. Constable Yang was sadly murdered while she was courageously doing her job. This has to stop. This is one of a series of murders of our police officers as part of a larger violent crime wave. What changes will the Prime Minister make to policies to put this crime wave to an end?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.0

Trudeau expresses condolences and calls for more mental health funding and provincial-federal cooperation but offers no specific policy changes.

The Prime Minister expresses condolences and gestures toward mental health funding but names no specific policy changes, numbers, or commitments, making the answer tangential to the accountability ask.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, our hearts go out to the family of Constable Yang and to the community, not just in B.C. but right across the country, as we know we have seen murdered police officers in Ontario and elsewhere across the country as well. We need to do more to step up on our mental health funding, as the hon. member before mentioned. We need to make sure that we are giving our frontline police officers the tools to be supported as they encounter difficult situations. We need to make sure they are not the only mental health workers out there accessible to so many people. Unfortunately they have been. They have been extraordinary at it, but we need to provide better support. The provinces and the federal government need to work together to fund more mental health supports.

Taxation
#2
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
7.5

Poilievre cites specific food price increases and asks the Prime Minister to reverse the carbon tax hike that raises costs of transporting and producing food.

The question cites specific inflation figures for food items (bread 17%, pasta 23%, lettuce 21%, flour 24%) and asks a clear policy question about reversing the carbon tax hike.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Mr. Speaker, Canadians are also suffering with the skyrocketing increases in the price of food. Today we learned food prices are up 11%. It is 17% for bread. Pasta is up 23%, lettuce 21% and flour 24%. The Prime Minister's solution, of course, is to raise taxes on food with a carbon tax hike that will triple the tax on the cost of transporting and producing food in the first place. Will he reverse this tax hike so that Canadians can put food on the table?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.0

Trudeau touts the GST rebate receiving royal assent and challenges Conservatives to support dental care and rental support measures.

Trudeau pivots entirely to the GST rebate and challenges Conservatives on dental care and rental supports, never addressing the carbon tax hike on food transportation and production.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, our solution to support families is to move forward with a GST rebate that is going to hit 11 million households. It just received royal assent last night because all parties supported it. The Conservatives actually reversed their initial opposition to our proposal in order to support it, and that was a good thing. Now the Conservatives have an opportunity to continue to help families that need it, with dental care for kids who cannot access it right now across the country and with direct help for low-income renters. Will the Conservative leader reverse this position and support low-income families that need it?

#3
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
5.0

Poilievre references a Royal Bank projection of $3,000 more per family due to inflation and higher interest rates and asks the Prime Minister to stop raising costs on Canadians.

The question cites a Royal Bank figure of $3,000 extra cost per family and links it to half-trillion-dollar deficits, but the final ask — 'let up and get off their backs' — is vague and rhetorical.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, the Prime Minister is proposing to do exactly nothing for the vast majority of struggling families, which will get nothing, and even the small minority that do get something will find it gobbled up by increased inflation. The Royal Bank says that the average family will pay $3,000 more in inflation and higher interest rates. These are the results of the half-trillion dollars of inflationary deficits that are driving up the cost of the goods we buy and the interest we pay. Now he wants to triple the tax on food. Canadians are paying enough to put food on the table. Will the Prime Minister let up and get off their backs?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau asks why the Conservatives are not supporting dental care and rental supports worth $1,300 and $500 respectively for eligible families.

Trudeau does not address the Royal Bank figure or the deficit argument at all, instead pivoting entirely to dental care and rental supports and attacking the Conservatives for blocking them.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, if the leader of the official opposition wants to help Canadians, why is he not stepping up to help Canadian families give dental care to their kids? We are talking about $1,300 over the next two years to support families that need it across the country, and we are talking about direct support to low-income renters. This is money that can make a huge difference in Canadians' lives. The reality is that not only do they not support it, but they are trying to do everything they can to block it and even kill our support for these families.

#4
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
5.5

Poilievre cites the Royal Bank's $3,000 inflation cost projection for average families and asks the Prime Minister to cancel inflationary deficits and taxes.

Poilievre again cites the Royal Bank $3,000 figure and asks the Prime Minister to cancel inflationary deficits and taxes, but the ask remains somewhat compound.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, la grande majoritĂ© des Canadiens ne sont pas admissibles Ă  cet argent-lĂ , et mĂȘme ceux qui le recevront vont le voir disparaĂźtre. L'inflation va coĂ»ter 3 000 $ Ă  la famille moyenne, ici, au Canada, l'annĂ©e prochaine, selon la Banque Royale. Les Canadiens ne peuvent plus payer, mais le premier ministre veut ajouter des frais Ă  leur facture. Va-t-il annuler ses plans de continuer ses dĂ©ficits et ses taxes inflationnistes?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, most Canadians are not eligible for that money, and those who do get it will not be able to hang on to it for very long. According to the Royal Bank, inflation is going to cost the average family here in Canada $3,000 next year. Canadians cannot afford to pay any more, but the Prime Minister is going to add to their bills. Will he cancel his plans to continue his inflationary deficits and taxes?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau defends the GST rebate, dental care, and rental support measures and asks why Conservatives are not supporting them.

Trudeau mischaracterizes Poilievre's argument and pivots entirely to the GST rebate, dental care, and rental support without addressing the deficit or carbon tax question.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le Président, j'essaie de comprendre la logique du chef de l'opposition. Il dit que l'inflation est tellement grande et que les coûts sont tellement élevés pour les familles que cela ne sert à rien de faire quoi que ce soit. Au contraire, nous sommes là pour aider de façon concrÚte, comme le remboursement de la TPS. Nous sommes là pour aider les familles qui ont des enfants de moins de 12 ans et qui ne peuvent pas payer des soins dentaires. Nous sommes là pour aider les locataires à faible revenu avec leur loyer cet automne. Pourquoi est-ce que les conservateurs ne sont pas là pour aider ces familles? Nous ne voulons pas des excuses, nous voulons qu'ils appuient nos mesures pour aider les Canadiens.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, I am trying to understand the opposition leader's logic. He is saying that inflation and costs are so high for families that there is no point in doing anything. On the contrary, we are there to provide real help, like the GST rebate. We are there to help families with children under the age of 12 who cannot afford dental care. We are there to help low-income renters with their rent this fall. Why are the Conservatives not there to help these families? We do not want excuses. We want them to support our measures to help Canadians.

#5
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
6.0

Poilievre cites the Bank of Canada Governor's statement about homegrown inflation and asks why the Prime Minister is raising taxes on food producers and transporters.

The question makes a substantive point about domestically produced goods (bread, pasta, flour) and cites the Governor of the Bank of Canada's statement that 'inflation in Canada increasingly reflects what's happening in Canada,' giving it factual grounding.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Mr. Speaker, ironically, the goods that have gone up the most in price are those that we can produce right here in Canada: bread, pasta and flour. We grow wheat in this country. We should be able to deliver it to people's kitchen tables affordably, but the Prime Minister wants to raise taxes on the people who do the growing of our food and the delivering of it to our grocery stores. Even the Governor of the Bank of Canada says that “inflation in Canada increasingly reflects what’s happening in Canada.” This is homegrown Liberal inflation. Why does the Prime Minister not stop raising the prices on Canadians so they can put food on the table?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.0

Trudeau argues that the price on pollution returns more money to Canadians than it costs, citing over $550 in climate rebates for a family of four this year.

Trudeau defends the price on pollution as returning money to Canadians and cites over $550 in climate rebates for a family of four in the opposition leader's riding, which does not address the specific claim about taxing food producers and transporters.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, let us be very clear. Our price on pollution puts more money back in the pockets of Canadians while ensuring they breathe cleaner air. With cheques issued in June and just last Friday, a family of four in the opposition leader's riding has already received over $550 from our government in climate rebates this year. This means more money for Canadians. While the Conservative leader does not believe that climate change is a problem, we are moving forward with practical, affordable solutions to support families, grow the economy and fight climate change at the same time.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship
#6
Mr. Yves-François Blanchet BQBeloeil—Chambly
7.0

Blanchet asks why $28 million in contracts were given to a Liberal Party friend under false pretenses about chemin Roxham land, instead of investing in qualified immigration teams at the ministry.

Blanchet references a specific $28 million contract awarded to a Liberal Party friend under false pretenses regarding proximity to chemin Roxham, and asks a pointed question about redirecting funds to qualified immigration teams.

Source text
Mr. Yves-François Blanchet

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, 28 millions de dollars en contrats ont Ă©tĂ© octroyĂ©s Ă  un ami du Parti libĂ©ral. On a prĂ©tendu que c'Ă©tait parce que les terrains qui Ă©taient louĂ©s sont sur le bord du chemin Roxham, mais nous avons dĂ©couvert que ce n'est tout simplement pas vrai. PlutĂŽt que de donner l'argent des contribuables aux amis du Parti libĂ©ral, pourquoi le premier ministre ne s'assure‑t‑il pas d'accueillir dĂ©cemment les demandeurs d'asile en dĂ©tresse aux passages rĂ©guliers avec l'argent investi dans des Ă©quipes qualifiĂ©es au ministĂšre de l'Immigration?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, a friend of the Liberal Party was handed $28 million in contracts supposedly because the land that was being leased is next to Roxham Road. However, we have found out that this is simply not true. Instead of giving taxpayers' money to friends of the Liberal Party, why does the Prime Minister not invest that money in qualified teams at the immigration department? That way, he can ensure that desperate asylum seekers are given a decent welcome at regular crossings.

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau speaks generally about maintaining a robust and humane asylum system and working with the United States on a durable solution, without addressing the contract allegation.

Trudeau does not address the $28 million contract allegation or the factual claim about the land, instead offering generic statements about a robust and humane asylum system and working with the United States.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, nous nous assurons tous les jours que notre systĂšme pour les demandeurs d'asile demeure robuste et humain. Il n'y a pas de solution magique, mais nous allons continuer d'ĂȘtre lĂ  pour les gens et de nous assurer que nos valeurs sont reflĂ©tĂ©es dans nos systĂšmes d'immigration. Il est indĂ©niable qu'il faut continuer Ă  travailler sur la question elle‑mĂȘme, y compris avec les États‑Unis, pour avoir une solution durable. Nous allons continuer d'ĂȘtre lĂ  pour reprĂ©senter nos valeurs et accueillir les gens de façon responsable.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, we are working every day to ensure that our system for asylum seekers remains robust and humane. There is no magic bullet, but we will continue to be there for people and ensure that our values are reflected in our immigration systems. There is no question that we must continue to work on the issue itself, alongside the United States, to find a lasting solution. We will continue to be there, representing our values and welcoming people in a responsible manner.

#7
Mr. Yves-François Blanchet BQBeloeil—Chambly
6.0

Blanchet asks the Prime Minister to explain why francophone African students are being racially discriminated against by his government's immigration policies.

Blanchet raises a specific allegation of racial discrimination against francophone African students in immigration policy, which is a serious and identifiable claim, though the framing meanders before arriving at the ask.

Source text
Mr. Yves-François Blanchet

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, il n'y a pas si longtemps, le premier ministre et la vice‑premiĂšre ministre se consultaient avant d'annoncer des positions. Cela avait donnĂ© la chose suivante: on parlait de faire entrer de la main‑d'Ɠuvre par le chemin Roxham, essentiellement des bras pas chers. Si le gouvernement a une prĂ©occupation pour la main‑d'Ɠuvre, il y a des gens qui vont devenir de la main‑d'Ɠuvre hautement qualifiĂ©e et qui veulent venir. Ce sont des Ă©tudiants africains francophones discriminĂ©s sur une base raciale par son gouvernement. Je demande au premier ministre de m'expliquer cela.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, not so long ago, the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister would consult one another before announcing a position. At one point, there was talk of bringing workers in via Roxham Road, cheap labour, essentially. If the government is worried about the workforce, there are people out there who are on their way to becoming highly skilled workers and who want to come here. The people I am referring to are francophone African students, but his government is discriminating against them on the basis of race. I would like the Prime Minister to explain that to me.

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.0

Trudeau states the government has zero tolerance for racism and systemic discrimination, is studying impacts on racialized clients, and that the minister is seized of the file.

Trudeau states the government has no tolerance for racism or systemic discrimination and says the minister is seized of the matter, but provides no specific information about the discrimination allegation or what is being done.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le Président, nous n'avons aucune tolérance pour le racisme ou la discrimination de quelque nature que ce soit, y compris la discrimination systémique. Nous étudions les répercussions de nos programmes et de nos politiques sur les clients racialisés pour nous assurer qu'ils sont justes et équitables pour tous ceux qui souhaitent venir étudier au Canada. Le ministÚre doit appliquer les lois et les procédures d'immigration de maniÚre équitable et sans discrimination, et je sais que le ministre est saisi de ce dossier.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, we have zero tolerance for racism or discrimination of any kind, including systemic discrimination. We are looking at the impact of our programs and policies on racialized clients to ensure that they are fair and equitable to everyone who wants to come study in Canada. The department has to enforce immigration procedures fairly and without discrimination, and I know the minister is working on this matter.

The Economy
#8
Mr. Jagmeet Singh NDPBurnaby South
3.5

Singh references new inflation data showing rising grocery costs and asks when the Prime Minister will act to support families, accusing both Liberals and Conservatives of doing nothing to fight 'séraphinflation.'

Singh references new inflation numbers and uses the term 'sĂ©raphinflation' but the ask — when will the Prime Minister act — is vague and does not specify which solutions he wants implemented.

Source text
Mr. Jagmeet Singh

Mr. Speaker, on behalf of all New Democrats, I want to express my condolences to the friends, family and colleagues of Constable Yang over the horrific killing that was experienced in Burnaby. Les nouveaux chiffres concernant l'inflation publiĂ©s aujourd'hui montrent de façon claire que le coĂ»t de l'Ă©picerie continue d'augmenter. C'est difficile pour les familles et cela crĂ©e de grands dĂ©fis pour les travailleurs. Il est indĂ©niable que les libĂ©raux et les conservateurs n'ont rien fait pour se battre contre la « sĂ©raphinflation ». Quand ce premier ministre va‑t‑il agir pour appuyer les familles?

Hansard translation: Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, au nom de tous les nĂ©o-dĂ©mocrates, je tiens Ă  offrir mes condolĂ©ances aux amis, Ă  la famille et aux collĂšgues de la constable Yang Ă  la suite de cet horrible meurtre qui a eu lieu Ă  Burnaby. The new inflation numbers released today clearly show that the cost of groceries continues to go up. Families are struggling and workers are facing enormous challenges. It is clear that the Liberals and Conservatives have done nothing to tackle this “greedflation”. When will the Prime Minister take action to support families?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
5.0

Trudeau highlights the GST credit reaching 11 million households and calls on all parties to support dental care and rental support legislation.

Trudeau cites the GST credit going to 11 million households and references the dental and rental support measures, which is partially responsive to the cost-of-living framing but does not address the 'séraphinflation' accusation.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le Président, au cours des semaines à venir, 11 millions de ménages canadiens recevront le crédit pour la TPS qu'on est en train de leur envoyer. Cela va les aider énormément: c'est presque 500 $ pour certaines familles, mais de l'argent pour 11 millions de ménages. Cela fait une grosse différence et c'est arrivé parce que les conservateurs ont changé d'idée et décidé d'appuyer nos propositions. Maintenant, nous espérons pouvoir faire adopter l'aide pour les soins dentaires et pour les locataires à faible revenu. Nous demandons à tous les partis à la Chambre de se joindre à nous pour accélérer les choses et offrir de l'aide concrÚte aux Canadiens qui en ont besoin.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, in the coming weeks, 11 million Canadian households will receive the GST credit that is being sent to them, which will help enormously. Some families will receive nearly $500, and this credit is going out to 11 million households. This is making a big difference, and it was possible because the Conservative members changed their minds and decided to support our proposal. Now we are hoping to get dental care for low-income families and assistance for low-income renters passed. We are asking all parties in the House to join us in speeding this up and delivering real help to Canadians who need it.

#9
Mr. Jagmeet Singh NDPBurnaby South
5.5

Singh cites 11.4% food inflation, references the NDP motion to tackle greedflation, calls Galen Weston's announcement a PR stunt, and asks the Prime Minister to implement NDP solutions now.

Singh cites a specific food inflation record of 11.4%, references the NDP motion on greedflation, and calls the Galen Weston announcement a PR stunt, making it reasonably grounded, though 'our solutions' is not specified.

Source text
Mr. Jagmeet Singh

Mr. Speaker, the new inflation numbers are deeply troubling. We see the cost of food continue to rise and set a record at 11.4%. We know that the Liberals and the Conservatives do not have the courage to take on greedflation, but we do. We forced everyone in this House to support our motion to tackle greedflation, and we know that the PR stunt from Galen Weston is not good enough. Will the Prime Minister implement our solutions to support families now?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
5.0

Trudeau cites the doubled GST credit for close to 11 million households and asks all parliamentarians to support dental care and rental support measures.

Trudeau outlines the doubled GST credit for six months for close to 11 million households and calls for support on dental care and rental measures, which engages the cost-of-living topic but does not address the specific greedflation solutions the NDP is proposing.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, we know Canadians are struggling with the rising cost of living, which is why when we came back to the House this fall, we immediately brought in measures to double the GST credit for six months for close to 11 million households. That was something that, fortunately, all members of this House supported, including the Conservatives, who reversed their earlier objection to our proposal and then supported it. Now we need all parliamentarians to come together to make sure we are supporting families that need to pay for dental care for kids under 12, and to move forward on direct supports for low-income renters. All parliamentarians can stand together and do that.

Taxation
#10
Mr. Jasraj Singh Hallan CPCCalgary Forest Lawn
6.5

Hallan cites inflation figures of 11.4% for groceries, 13.2% for gas, and 12.8% for utilities, and asks the Prime Minister to cancel plans to triple the tax on groceries, gas and home heating.

Hallan cites specific inflation figures (groceries 11.4%, gas 13.2%, utilities 12.8%) and asks a pointed question about cancelling plans to triple the tax on groceries, gas and home heating, though the framing mixes several causation claims.

Source text
Mr. Jasraj Singh Hallan

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister's failed policies and direct attack on our responsible energy sector has caused higher prices and a cost of living crisis in this country. Groceries went up 11.4%. Gas is up 13.2%. Utilities are up 12.8%. We have out-of-control spending and cancelled and blocked energy projects in Canada, and the Prime Minister's carbon tax is causing unjust inflation. Will the Prime Minister stop punishing Canadians and cancel his plans to triple the tax on groceries, gas and home heating?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.5

Trudeau attributes inflation to global causes and the end of the pandemic, then pivots to the GST credit and challenges the Conservatives' caucus to support dental and rental measures.

Trudeau begins attributing inflation to global causes before being interrupted, then pivots entirely to the GST credit reversal by Conservatives and dental/rental supports, never addressing the carbon tax tripling question.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, we know Canadians are struggling with this global inflation crisis caused by the end of the pandemic, by stresses on supply chains, by the illegal invasion of Russia in Ukraine—

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, that is why we are moving forward with direct supports for families. We know that even though the Leader of the Opposition came out in opposition to our GST credit for Canadians when we first announced it, members of his caucus told him they would support it and eventually they reversed their position. Will members of his caucus now tell him they should support dental and rental supports?

#11
Mr. Jasraj Singh Hallan CPCCalgary Forest Lawn
6.0

Hallan cites average annual rent exceeding $24,000 and home ownership costs at 60% of median household income, and asks the Prime Minister to cancel plans to triple the carbon tax on groceries, gas and home heating.

Hallan cites average rent over $24,000 per year and home ownership costs at 60% of median household income due to massive rate hikes, giving the question factual grounding, though it ends with the same 'cancel the carbon tax' ask as previous questions.

Source text
Mr. Jasraj Singh Hallan

Mr. Speaker, the reality is that Canada is falling apart under the Prime Minister and it is more unaffordable than ever. The average rent in Canada is now over $24,000 a year, and $500 rent cheques will not even pay for one week of rent right now. Because the Prime Minister does not think about monetary policy, it has never been more unaffordable to buy a home in Canada. Massive rate hikes have pushed home ownership costs to 60% of median household income. Will the Prime Minister take responsibility for his unjust inflation and cancel his plans to triple the carbon tax on groceries, gas and home heating?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.0

Trudeau defends the $500 rental support as making a huge difference for low-income renters and expresses puzzlement at Conservative opposition to delivering it before Christmas.

Trudeau misrepresents the Conservative argument and defends the $500 rental support without addressing the home ownership affordability figures or the carbon tax question.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, I am having a hard time understanding the logic the Conservative Party seems to be putting forward today. They seem to be saying that because our help for low-income renters is only $500, they may as well get nothing. Maybe the Conservatives do not know this, but giving $500 to low-income renters will make a huge difference for an awful lot of people as the winter approaches. That is why we are there to support Canadians who need it. It is inexplicable to me that the Conservative Party continues to stand against delivering $500 cheques to families that need it to pay their rent before Christmas.

#12
Mr. Luc Berthold CPCMĂ©gantic—L'Érable
6.5

Berthold cites polling data and 11% food inflation as the highest since 1981, with overall inflation at 7%, and asks why the Prime Minister wants to reduce Canadians' paycheques on January 1.

Berthold cites polling figures (100% affected by inflation, 80% worried about finances, 72% feel they pay too much taxes), the food inflation figure as the highest since 1981, and an overall inflation rate of 7%, and asks a specific question about the payroll tax increase on January 1.

Source text
Mr. Luc Berthold

Monsieur le Président, voici quelques faits pour le premier ministre: 100 % des Canadiens vont subir les conséquences de l'inflation; 80 % des Canadiens s'inquiÚtent de leurs finances en raison de la hausse du coût de la vie; 72 % des Canadiens estiment qu'ils paient trop de taxes. Le coût de la nourriture a augmenté de 11 % et c'est la plus forte hausse depuis 1981. En raison de l'inaction des libéraux, l'inflation continue de grimper. Comme on l'a appris ce matin, elle atteint 7 %. Pourquoi le premier ministre veut-il rendre la vie des gens encore plus difficile en réduisant encore leur chÚque de paie le 1er janvier prochain?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, here are some facts for the Prime Minister: 100% of Canadians are going to suffer the consequences of inflation; 80% of Canadians are worried about their finances because of the rising cost of living; 72% of Canadians think they are paying too much tax. The cost of food has gone up 11%, the biggest increase since 1981. As a result of the Liberals' inaction, inflation continues to climb. As we learned this morning, it is now at 7%. Why does the Prime Minister want to make life even more difficult for people by further reducing their paycheque on January 1?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.5

Trudeau acknowledges difficult times and defends rental support and dental care measures, asking why Conservatives will not support them.

Trudeau acknowledges difficult times but deflects entirely to dental care and rental supports without addressing the January 1 payroll tax increase that was specifically asked about.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le Président, je suis tout à fait d'accord que les Canadiens font face à des moments difficiles. C'est pour cela que nous proposons de l'aide directe aux familles, aux locataires à faible revenu et aux familles avec des enfants de moins de 12 ans qui ne peuvent pas payer les soins dentaires dont ont besoin leurs enfants. C'est inexplicable que le Parti conservateur ait décidé qu'il n'allait pas appuyer ces mesures qui vont profiter aux Canadiens et aider les gens. Pourquoi est-ce que les conservateurs ne veulent pas aider les Canadiens qui ont besoin d'aide maintenant? Nous sommes là pour le faire. Pourquoi, eux, ne le sont-ils pas?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, I completely agree that Canadians are going through a tough time. That is why we are proposing direct help for families, low-income renters and families with children under 12 who cannot afford the dental care that their children need. It is inexplicable that the Conservative Party has decided not to support these measures that will benefit Canadians and help people. Why do the Conservatives not want to help Canadians who are in need right now? We are there to do that. Why are they not?

#13
Mr. Luc Berthold CPCMĂ©gantic—L'Érable
6.0

Berthold invokes the Prime Minister's Throne Speech promise that interest rates would stay low and asks directly, yes or no, whether he will cancel the payroll tax hike planned for January 1.

Berthold references Prime Minister Trudeau's own Throne Speech promise that interest rates would stay low, citing Mario Dumont as the source, and asks a direct yes-or-no question about cancelling the payroll tax hike on January 1.

Source text
Mr. Luc Berthold

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, c'est parce qu'il n'y a plus personne qui croit ce premier ministre. C'est la rĂ©alitĂ©. Il a perdu toute crĂ©dibilitĂ© en matiĂšre de finances publiques. C'est Mario Dumont qui nous rappelait ce matin la promesse du premier ministre dans son discours inaugural que les taux d'intĂ©rĂȘt allaient rester bas pour toujours. Aujourd'hui, il y a des jeunes familles qui risquent de tout perdre Ă  cause de l'incapacitĂ© du premier ministre de gĂ©rer les finances publiques au Canada. C'est la rĂ©alitĂ©. Va-t-il renoncer Ă  hausser les taxes sur les chĂšques de paie des Canadiens le 1er janvier prochain, oui ou non?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, it is because no one believes this Prime Minister anymore. That is the reality. He has lost all credibility with regard to public finances. Mario Dumont reminded us this morning that the Prime Minister promised in his inaugural speech that interest rates would remain low forever. Today, there are young families that could lose everything because of the Prime Minister's inability to manage Canada's public finances. That is the reality. Will he cancel the January 1 tax increase on Canadians' paycheque, yes or no?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau defends pandemic spending, says the economy recovered strongly, and pivots to current rental and dental supports, without addressing the January 1 payroll tax question.

Trudeau does not answer the yes-or-no question about the January 1 payroll tax hike, instead defending pandemic spending and pivoting to current support measures while attacking the Conservative economic approach.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, on voit lĂ  une dĂ©connexion profonde dans l'approche conservatrice par rapport Ă  l'Ă©conomie. Nous avons Ă©tĂ© lĂ  pour aider les familles qui en avaient besoin pendant la pandĂ©mie. MalgrĂ© les objections des conservateurs, nous avons pu aider des millions de familles. L'Ă©conomie est revenue en force aprĂšs la pandĂ©mie. Nous proposons de faire exactement la mĂȘme chose maintenant: aider les familles avec les coĂ»ts de la vie, avec de l'aide pour les locataires Ă  faible revenu et avec de l'aide pour les soins dentaires. Les conservateurs sont encore lĂ  pour essayer de bloquer et ne pas aider ces familles. On ne comprend rien Ă  leur approche Ă©conomique. Nous, nous allons ĂȘtre lĂ  pour les Canadiens.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, we see that there is a serious disconnect in the Conservatives' approach to the economy. We were there to help families in need during the pandemic. Despite the Conservatives' objections, we were able to help millions of families. Economic recovery was strong after the pandemic. We are proposing to do exactly the same thing now: help families with the cost of living, provide assistance to low-income renters and help with dental care expenses. The Conservatives are still trying to put up roadblocks and not help these families. We cannot make heads or tails of their economic approach. As for us, we will be there for Canadians.

#14
Ms. Leslyn Lewis CPCHaldimand—Norfolk
3.0

Lewis references emails from Canadians saying they could not afford a turkey for Thanksgiving and asks the Prime Minister to cancel plans to triple taxes on gas, home heating and groceries.

Lewis anecdotally references emails about Canadians unable to afford a turkey at Thanksgiving and repeats the carbon tax ask, but the question is primarily rhetorical and emotional rather than specific or factually grounded.

Source text
Ms. Leslyn Lewis

Mr. Speaker, the current cost of living crisis is caused by the government's reckless and irresponsible spending. Canadians cannot afford basic necessities anymore. I recently received emails from people all over the country, telling me that for the first time ever they could not afford to buy a turkey and even some food items for a Thanksgiving dinner. Canadians are suffering. Will the current Prime Minister show some compassion for Canadians who are struggling and cancel his plans to triple taxes on gas, home heating and groceries?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.5

Trudeau pivots to the $500 rental support and $1,300 dental care benefit for families with kids under 12 and challenges Conservatives for blocking them.

Trudeau pivots to dental care and rental supports and questions Conservative sincerity, without addressing the carbon tax tripling or the Thanksgiving affordability anecdotes.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, this supposed preoccupation of the Conservatives with the cost of living would be slightly more believable if not for the fact they are standing in the way of delivering $500 in extra support to low-income renters between now and Christmas and standing in the way of giving $1,300 in extra access to dental care for families with kids under 12 who need that support. We know that low- and middle-income families could greatly benefit from that help. Why are the Conservatives not standing up for those families?

#15
Ms. Leslyn Lewis CPCHaldimand—Norfolk
4.5

Lewis references a constituent named Amy, a first-time mother unable to afford basic necessities for her baby, and begins asking when the Prime Minister will cancel his plan to triple the carbon tax before being cut off.

Lewis references a constituent named Amy, a first-time mother worried about basic necessities for her baby, which adds personal grounding, but the question is cut off before the specific ask is completed, reducing its accountability value.

Source text
Ms. Leslyn Lewis

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister knows that the policies proposed by the Liberals will not reach the majority of Canadian families, yet Canadians are making immense sacrifices just to get by. People are even rationing food. Amy, a first-time mother in my riding, recently wrote to me in desperation. She was worried about not having the basic necessities to raise and care for her baby. The Prime Minister's obsession with taxes is taking away the ability of average people like Amy to afford basic supplies and keep warm during the winter. When will the Prime Minister stop punishing Canadians and cancel his plan to triple—

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.5

Trudeau expresses empathy for Amy and says she will benefit from $10-a-day child care and halved child care costs in Ontario before being cut off.

Trudeau responds to Amy specifically by mentioning $10-a-day child care and slashed child care costs in Ontario, which is somewhat responsive to the constituent's situation but does not address the carbon tax question and is also cut off.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, our hearts go out to Amy and families like hers across the country who are dealing with the rising cost of living. However, we also know that Amy will now have access to significant savings in child care for her little one. We know that our move to get down to $10-a-day child care, to see child care costs slashed in half across Ontario and indeed across the country, will make a huge difference in her ability to afford the other things that are necessary for her family. My question is this. If the Conservatives are so filled with compassion for those families, why are they standing in the way of support for families and even in the way of—

Public Safety
#16
Mr. Yves-François Blanchet BQBeloeil—Chambly
6.5

Blanchet asks whether the Prime Minister was clumsy or politically motivated in invoking the emergency measures during the truckers' protests without dialogue and without anyone requesting it.

The question references a specific factual claim (that no one asked for the emergency measures) and poses a genuine binary accountability ask, though it is framed with emotional rhetoric.

Source text
Mr. Yves-François Blanchet

Monsieur le Président, en janvier, le premier ministre a décidé d'imposer les mesures d'urgence lors des manifestations des camionneurs sans tentative de dialogue et, a-t-on appris, sans que personne ne le lui ait demandé. Ce faisant, au lieu de régler une crise, il a contribué à empirer une crise. Admet-il, à sa convenance, que soit il a été trÚs maladroit, soit il l'a fait pour des motifs politiques? S'il s'agit de motifs politiques, quels sont-ils, nom de Dieu?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, in January, the Prime Minister decided to invoke emergency measures during the trucker protests without any attempt at dialogue and, as we have learned, without anyone asking him to. In so doing, he exacerbated the crisis rather than resolving it. Would he admit, at his convenience, that his actions were either very heavy-handed or politically motivated? If he did it for political reasons, what were they, for heaven's sake?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
5.5

Trudeau says the Loi sur les mesures d'urgence was invoked responsibly, in a restrained and time-limited way, and that the public inquiry will show the illegal occupations were a real problem for the economy and democracy.

Trudeau defends the invocation of the Loi sur les mesures d'urgence as responsible and limited and points to the ongoing public inquiry, but does not address whether he acted unilaterally or for political motives.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, nous avons invoquĂ© la Loi sur les mesures d'urgence d'une façon responsable, restreinte et limitĂ©e dans le temps qui respectait entiĂšrement les droits et libertĂ©s fondamentaux de tous les Canadiens. Nous avons fait cela parce que la situation l'exigeait. Je suis trĂšs content qu'une enquĂȘte publique se dĂ©roule en ce moment pour permettre Ă  tous les Canadiens de voir ce que nous voyions, c'est-Ă -dire que ces occupations illĂ©gales constituaient un problĂšme rĂ©el, pas juste pour les rĂ©sidents d'Ottawa et des gens de partout au pays, mais aussi pour notre Ă©conomie et pour le bien-ĂȘtre de notre dĂ©mocratie. Nous avons fait ce que nous avions Ă  faire de façon responsable.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, we invoked the Emergencies Act in a responsible, targeted and time-limited manner that fully respected the fundamental rights and freedoms of all Canadians. We did so because the situation demanded it. I am very pleased that a public inquiry is now taking place to allow all Canadians to see what we were seeing, namely, that these illegal occupations were a real problem, not just for the residents of Ottawa and people across the country, but for our economy and for the well-being of our democracy. We did what we had to do, in a responsible way.

#17
Mr. Yves-François Blanchet BQBeloeil—Chambly
2.5

Blanchet asks whether the Prime Minister frequently misleads the House, citing a $28-million contract to a friend, racial discrimination against African students, and the unjustified emergency measures.

The question bundles three unrelated allegations (the $28-million contract, racial discrimination against African students, and the emergency measures) into a vague meta-ask about whether the Prime Minister misleads the House, making it largely rhetorical and compound.

Source text
Mr. Yves-François Blanchet

Monsieur le Président, je ne suis pas sûr que c'est ce que les Canadiens perçoivent. Je propose qu'on remplace le serment au roi par un serment à la vérité. C'est dans l'air du temps. Si on disait un peu plus la vérité ici, cela changerait complÚtement les travaux de la Chambre. En quelques jours, le gouvernement a octroyé 28 millions de dollars de contrat à un ami. Le gouvernement a pratiqué la discrimination raciale contre des étudiants africains. Le gouvernement a imposé des mesures d'urgence qui ne s'imposaient d'aucune espÚce de façon. Est-ce que le premier ministre met fréquemment la Chambre sur des pistes qui ne sont pas la vérité?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, I am not sure Canadians see it that way. I think that, instead of swearing an oath to the King, we should get with the times and swear an oath to the truth. If people here told the truth a little more often, that would completely change the work we do in the House. In the space of a few days, the government granted 28 million dollars' worth of contracts to a friend. The government engaged in racial discrimination against African students. The government imposed emergency measures that were in no way, shape or form necessary. Does the Prime Minister often lead the House down the garden path?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
1.5

Trudeau says the priority for Québécois is the cost of living and lists upcoming legislation on dental care, rent support, and GST credits.

Trudeau pivots entirely to the cost of living and upcoming legislation, ignoring all three specific allegations and the question about truthfulness.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le Président, le Bloc québécois parle de serment et de royauté, mais, en ce moment, notre priorité et celle des Québécois, c'est le coût de la vie. Nous allons continuer de nous concentrer là-dessus, notamment avec des projets de loi pour aider les gens à payer leurs factures. Nos projets de loi vont remettre des centaines de dollars dans les poches des Canadiens,fournir aux enfants les soins dentaires dont ils ont besoin et aider les familles à payer leur loyer. C'est là-dessus que nous allons continuer de travailler pour tous les Québécois et pour tous les Canadiens.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois is talking about oaths and royalty, but, at this point in time, our priority and that of Quebeckers is the cost of living. We will continue to focus on that, and we will do it with legislation that helps people pay their bills. Our proposed legislation will put hundreds of dollars back in the pockets of Canadians, give children the dental care they need and help families pay the rent. That is what we will keep working on for all Quebeckers and all Canadians.

Public Services and Procurement
#18
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
8.0

Poilievre asks whether the Prime Minister will supply the full list of all companies that received contracts for the ArriveCAN app, noting it cost $54 million despite a programmer showing it could have been built in a weekend for under $250,000, and that it wrongly sent over 10,000 people into quarantine.

The question cites a specific comparator cost (less than 250 000 $), the official figure (54 millions de dollars), a concrete harm (plus de 10 000 personnes forcées en quarantaine), and makes a single clear ask for the list of contractors.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, un programmeur a montrĂ© que l'application ArriveCAN aurait pu ĂȘtre créée en une fin de semaine pour un coĂ»t de moins de 250 000 $, mais le premier ministre a payĂ© 54 millions de dollars pour une application qui ne fonctionnait mĂȘme pas et qui a forcĂ© plus de 10 000 personnes Ă  se mettre en quarantaine alors qu'elles n'avaient pas Ă  le faire. Est-ce que le premier ministre va fournir la liste de toutes les entreprises qui ont reçu des contrats pour concevoir cette application qui ne fonctionnait mĂȘme pas?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, a programmer has shown that the ArriveCAN app could have been designed in a single weekend for less than $250,000, but the Prime Minister paid $54 million for an app that did not even work and forced more than 10,000 people to quarantine unnecessarily. Will the Prime Minister provide a list of all the companies that were contracted to develop that app, which did not even work?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.5

Trudeau defends the app as part of protecting Canadians during COVID-19 and explains the $54-million figure covers more than initial development, including cloud services, IT call centre services, upgrades, and future costs, but does not address the contractor list.

Trudeau provides a partial breakdown of what the $54-million figure includes (services supplémentaires, services du centre d'appel des TI, mises à niveau, coûts futurs) but does not commit to releasing the list of contractors.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, malgrĂ© les politicailleries du Parti conservateur, de ce cĂŽtĂ©-ci de la Chambre, nous nous sommes efforcĂ©s de tout faire pour protĂ©ger la santĂ© et la sĂ©curitĂ© de tous les Canadiens tout au long de la pandĂ©mie de COVID‑19, y compris avec l'application ArriveCAN. Le montant citĂ© comprend Ă©videmment bien plus que les coĂ»ts de conception initiaux. Il inclut les services supplĂ©mentaires, les services du centre d'appel des TI, les mises Ă  niveau, ainsi que les coĂ»ts futurs. Nous allons donc continuer de faire une utilisation optimale de l'argent des contribuables canadiens tout en les protĂ©geant jour et nuit.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, while the Conservative Party continues to play political games, we on this side of the House have been working hard to protect the health and safety of all Canadians throughout the COVID‑19 pandemic, including with the ArriveCAN app. The figure quoted obviously includes a lot more than just the initial design costs. It includes additional services, IT call centre services, updates and future costs. We will continue to deliver value for Canadian taxpayer dollars while protecting them around the clock.

#19
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
8.2

Poilievre asks the Prime Minister to supply Canadians with a full list of all contractors who received ArriveCAN money, citing the $54-million cost, the programmer's weekend estimate, 10,000 wrongly quarantined people, and companies using home addresses as headquarters.

Poilievre repeats the specific cost comparator, the $54-million figure, the 10,000 wrongly quarantined, the home-address headquarters detail, and makes a single clear ask for the full list of contractors, giving it strong factual grounding.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Well, Mr. Speaker, it is good to know, but no surprise, that the Prime Minister thinks that $54 million is just a petty matter. A programmer demonstrated that the ArriveCAN app could have been designed in a single weekend for less than a quarter of a million dollars. Instead, the Prime Minister paid $54 million. Ten thousand people were wrongly sent into quarantine by that app when they should not have been, and many of the contracts went to companies that have home addresses as their headquarters. Will the Prime Minister supply Canadians with a full list of all the contractors who got the money?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.0

Trudeau says the government focused on Canadians' safety and support since day one of the pandemic, and that the amount cited includes cloud storage, IT call centre services, upgrades, and future costs, without addressing the contractor list.

Trudeau again explains what the cited amount includes (cloud storage, IT call centre services, upgrades, future costs) and invokes pandemic support broadly, but still does not commit to releasing the contractor list.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, as Canadians well know, since day one of the pandemic we were focused on providing them the support and the safety necessary in this unprecedented time, despite the political games the Conservatives chose to play throughout the pandemic. Obviously, the amount cited includes far more than just the initial development of the app. It includes services like cloud storage, IT call centre services, upgrades and future costs. On this side of the aisle, we will continue to put the safety and security of Canadians at the centre of everything we do, both in unprecedented pandemics and in regular times.

#20
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
7.5

Poilievre challenges the Prime Minister to commit to supplying the House with the list of all subcontractors who received ArriveCAN money, noting roughly a dozen companies were involved and asking who got rich.

Poilievre sharpens the ask by specifically demanding the list of subcontractors and adding the detail that the Prime Minister is refusing to name them, making it a pointed accountability question, though it is the third iteration.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Mr. Speaker, creating a $54-million app, well over budget, that could have been created in a weekend for under a quarter of a million dollars does not protect anybody's safety; nor does an app that sends 10,000 people wrongly into quarantine. However, the strangest thing is that there are these roughly dozen companies that got the contracts to supply this app. The Prime Minister does not want to give all of the names of the subcontractors who got that money. I challenge him now: Will he commit to supplying this House with the list of all the subcontractors who got the money? Who got rich?

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
1.5

Trudeau speaks about Canadians pulling together during the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic and accuses Conservatives of peddling vaccine misinformation and refusing to follow public health directives, without addressing the subcontractor list.

Trudeau's response is entirely about pandemic solidarity and Conservatives peddling vaccine misinformation, with no mention of the subcontractor list or any specific ArriveCAN detail.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, Canadians well remember that during this unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic, we had a government that was stepping up to do everything we could to keep them safe and keep them protected. That is exactly what we—

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, Canadians well remember that when this unprecedented pandemic hit us, as a country, we pulled together. We had a government that stepped up to work with other orders of government to deliver all the protections we possibly could for Canadians in an unprecedented time. We were there to have Canadians' backs. While Conservatives were peddling vaccine misinformation and refusing to follow public health directives, we stepped up and made sure Canadians had all the tools to deliver safety for them. That is what we will continue to do.

#21
Pierre Poilievre CPCLeader of the Opposition
4.0

Poilievre alleges someone got rich from the ArriveCAN contracts, references the WE Charity scandal and home-address headquarters, and sarcastically challenges the person who spent $54 million on the app to stand up.

Poilievre raises the WE Charity reference and home-address headquarters detail and implicitly challenges the Prime Minister to produce the information, but the 'please stand up now' rhetorical flourish weakens the accountability value.

Source text
Pierre Poilievre

Mr. Speaker, they stepped up to put money in the pockets of their friends. We do not forget the WE Charity. Someone got rich here. Someone designed an app that did not work, that sent 10,000 people wrongly into quarantine, and that had home addresses as the headquarters of the companies that received the money. Many of the subcontractors are still secret. If the Prime Minister will not tell us the identity of those companies, then maybe the genius who spent $54 million on an app that could be designed in a weekend could please stand up now.

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau says the government spent tens of billions to support Canadians through the pandemic with direct income supports and supports for small businesses, arguing this helped the economy recover faster.

Trudeau pivots to broad pandemic spending on direct income supports and small businesses without engaging the subcontractor question or the WE Charity reference.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, our focus throughout this pandemic was being there to support Canadians. Before the member of the opposition criticizes me again for that, we spent billions, tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars to support Canadians through this pandemic with direct income supports and with supports for small businesses. We did that because we knew that being there for Canadians through an unprecedented difficult time would ensure that our economy would come back faster after it. That is exactly what happened. We were there for Canadians, while Conservatives can criticize us every step of the way.

The Economy
#22
Mr. Jagmeet Singh NDPBurnaby South
6.5

Singh asks whether the Prime Minister agrees with the Bank of Canada's approach to inflation, citing a CLC report by Jim Stanford arguing that interest rate increases will not address root causes and will cause a self-induced recession with massive job losses.

Singh cites a specific CLC report by Jim Stanford, identifies both mandates of the Bank of Canada, and poses a clear yes/no policy question, though it is broadly framed.

Source text
Mr. Jagmeet Singh

Mr. Speaker, the CLC put out a report by Jim Stanford that highlights some serious concerns with the Bank of Canada's approach to inflation. It lays out two mandates that the Bank of Canada must follow: one, to keep inflation in check, and two, to encourage maximum sustainable employment. Given the fact that the increased interest rates of the Bank of Canada will not address the root causes of inflation, they are certainly going to create a self-induced recession, which will result in massive job losses. Does the Prime Minister agree with the Bank of Canada's approach?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau says the government supports the integrity and independence of institutions like the Supreme Court and the Bank of Canada, without taking any position on the Bank's specific approach.

Trudeau speaks only about supporting the independence of institutions like the Supreme Court and the Bank of Canada, completely sidestepping whether he agrees with the Bank's approach to inflation.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, on this side of the House, we support the integrity and independence of our institutions. Canada has a long and storied history of strong institutions, from the Supreme Court to the Bank of Canada, that manage in counterpart with the work that is done in this House to serve Canadians. We will continue to defend the integrity and the independence of those institutions, unlike, apparently, multiple parties on the other side of the aisle.

#23
Mr. Jagmeet Singh NDPBurnaby South
7.0

Singh asks whether the Prime Minister agrees with the Bank of Canada's governor discouraging employers from increasing wages to keep up with inflation, noting there is no evidence high wages contributed to inflation.

Singh cites a specific public statement by the Bank of Canada's governor discouraging wage increases and asks a pointed yes/no question about whether the Prime Minister agrees with that position, grounding it in the government's own mandate-setting role.

Source text
Mr. Jagmeet Singh

Mr. Speaker, New Democrats have a rich tradition of calling out institutions that end up exploiting or hurting people. It is clear that the Government of Canada sets the mandate. Now, this very same Bank of Canada's governor has stated to employers that they are discouraged from increasing wages to keep up with inflation, which is ludicrous because there is absolutely no evidence that high wages have in any way contributed to inflation. In fact, wages have not kept up with inflation historically. Does the Prime Minister agree with the Bank of Canada's discouraging employers from increasing wages to keep up with inflation?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.0

Trudeau salutes union leaders across the country and says the government will continue working with labour, bargaining agents, and workers to ensure they are paid well, without addressing the governor's specific discouragement of wage increases.

Trudeau praises union leaders and says the government works with labour and bargaining agents for better wages but never addresses whether he agrees or disagrees with the Bank of Canada's governor's discouragement of wage increases.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, allow me to pause right now to salute and thank all the union leaders across the country who have been strong in fighting for better wages for their workers, working in partnership with the government in an unprecedented way to ensure that we are growing the middle class and helping the people working hard to join it. We will continue to make sure that we are working with labour, that we are working with bargaining agents, that we are working with workers to ensure that they are getting paid well for the work they are doing, so that they can support their families and their communities. We will do so in a way that Canadians expect us to.

Mr. George Chahal

Mr. Speaker, we recently learned the good news that over 2.5 million Canadians have now been lifted out of poverty since 2015, yet some of my constituents are still concerned about the rising cost of living. What are the latest actions our government is taking to help my constituents and all Canadians make ends meet?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the member for Calgary Skyview for his question and for his hard work. This week our GST credit top-up received royal assent, meaning Canadians will receive more support this fall as a result. Even as we fight climate change, we are putting more money back into Canadians' pockets. A family of four in the member's riding has received over $800 in climate action incentives so far this year. Unlike the Conservative approach of Bitcoin and buzzwords, we are talking about real action to make life more affordable for all Canadians.

Public Safety
#24
Ms. Raquel Dancho CPCKildonan—St. Paul
4.5

Dancho asks why the Prime Minister is failing to act to protect Canadians, citing a 32% increase in violent crime over the past seven years.

Dancho cites a 32% increase in violent crime over seven years, which gives the question some factual grounding, but the ask ('Why?') is too broad and the framing is largely partisan.

Source text
Ms. Raquel Dancho

Mr. Speaker, something has gone seriously wrong in this country. There has been a 32% increase in violent crime over the past seven years, and Canadians are feeling the impacts across the country. The fact is our neighbourhoods are less safe now than they were seven years ago when the Liberals first formed government. The Prime Minister is failing to act to protect Canadians. Why?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.5

Trudeau says moving back on gun control will not make communities safer and lists measures taken including interdicting assault weapons and freezing the market on hand guns, while attacking Conservatives for opposing these measures.

Trudeau pivots to gun control measures (interdicting assault weapons, freezing the market on hand guns) and attacks Conservatives, without addressing violent crime statistics or explaining the government's broader strategy.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, I can tell the House what will not make our communities safer: moving back on gun control. We have moved forward with strong measures on interdicting assault weapons and on freezing the market on hand guns. These are things, unfortunately, that Conservatives continue to stand against. They want to make assault weapons available again to Canadians. They want to make hand gun purchases available once again to Canadians. We are going to continue to stand for stronger gun control even as we invest in communities, even as we support our police forces and even as we stand forward to create a safer Canada.

#25
Ms. Raquel Dancho CPCKildonan—St. Paul
5.5

Dancho asks when the Prime Minister will take decisive action to protect Canadian families from violent criminals, citing over 124,000 additional violent crimes last year compared with 2015.

Dancho adds a more specific figure (over 124,000 additional violent crimes last year compared with 2015) but the ask remains vague ('decisive action') and the framing is heavily rhetorical.

Source text
Ms. Raquel Dancho

Mr. Speaker, there were over 124,000 additional violent crimes last year compared with in 2015. The Liberal approach is clearly failing Canadians. Crime is on the rise, and it is Canadian families who pay the price. The Prime Minister and the federal government have the real responsibility to act. The buck stops with them. They cannot just stand by and be passive observers. The time for action is today. When will the Prime Minister take decisive action to protect Canadian families from violent criminals?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.0

Trudeau says he hopes Conservatives will support the assault weapons ban and the freeze on handgun purchases, and that the government will continue to stand with families and against domestic violence.

Trudeau expresses hope that Conservatives will support gun control measures like the assault weapons ban and the handgun freeze but does not announce any new action or address the violent crime statistics.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, I am extremely encouraged to hear Conservatives bringing up questions like this, because it means maybe they are going to support us in our strengthening of gun control measures. Maybe they are going to finally stand behind us in our banning of assault weapons, which are no longer free to be bought, sold or used anywhere across the country. We are moving forward on a freeze on the purchase of handguns across the country. If the Conservative Party is deciding to support that, that is good news for communities across the country. We are going to continue to stand with families. We are going to continue to stand against domestic violence. We are going to continue to be there for communities that need support in the face of rising violence.

Public Services and Procurement
#26
Mr. Pierre Paul-Hus CPCCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles
8.5

Paul-Hus asks the Prime Minister to identify the owner of land at chemin Roxham and reveal the value of the secret contract, citing a $28-million sole-source contract and a Radio-Canada report that the Prime Minister is refusing to disclose the amount or the landowner's identity.

Paul-Hus cites a specific committee hearing, a specific sole-source contract, the location (Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle), the amount (28 millions de dollars), a Radio-Canada source confirming the Prime Minister's refusal to disclose, and asks two precise questions: who is the owner and what is the contract value.

Source text
Mr. Pierre Paul-Hus

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, au ComitĂ© permanent de l'accĂšs Ă  l'information, de la protection des renseignements personnels et de l'Ă©thique, lundi, les dĂ©putĂ©s libĂ©raux ont travaillĂ© trĂšs fort pour protĂ©ger leur donateur libĂ©ral, gagnant Ă  la loterie d'un contrat Ă  fournisseur unique d'une valeur de 28 millions de dollars pour ses terrains Ă  Saint‑Bernard‑de‑Lacolle. LĂ , on apprend par Radio-Canada que le premier ministre refuse de dĂ©voiler le montant du contrat secret et l'identitĂ© de l'heureux propriĂ©taire du terrain qui est situĂ© directement Ă  l'entrĂ©e du chemin Roxham. Est-ce que le premier ministre peut nous dire qui est le propriĂ©taire du terrain au chemin Roxham et quelle est la valeur du contrat?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, Monday at the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, Liberal members worked very hard to protect their Liberal donor, winner of a sole-source contract lottery worth $28 million for his land in Saint‑Bernard‑de‑Lacolle. Now, Radio-Canada is reporting that the Prime Minister is refusing to disclose the value of the secret contract and the identity of the lucky owner of the land that is located directly at the entrance of Roxham Road. Can the Prime Minister tell us who owns the land at Roxham Road and how much the contract is worth?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau speaks about the importance of Canada's immigration system and the country's values in welcoming asylum seekers, without addressing the contract value or the landowner's identity.

Trudeau speaks about the importance and integrity of Canada's immigration system and welcoming asylum seekers, which has no connection to the contractor identity or contract value question.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, nous savons tous Ă  quel point notre systĂšme d'immigration est important pour les Canadiens. C'est un systĂšme intĂšgre et robuste qui assure la croissance de notre Ă©conomie et de nos communautĂ©s. Il est important que nous veillions sur ce systĂšme de façon rigoureuse et que nous nous assurions que les valeurs que nous partageons tous en tant que Canadiens sont soutenues pendant que nous accueillons des demandeurs d'asile. Nous allons toujours le faire en bonne et due forme. Nous allons toujours nous assurer que les rĂšgles sont suivies. Nous allons toujours ĂȘtre lĂ  pour accueillir ceux qui fuient la violence et la terreur dans le monde, en concordance avec nos valeurs.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, we all know how important our immigration system is to Canadians. It is an upstanding and robust system that ensures the growth of our economy and our communities. It is important that we carefully monitor this system and ensure that the values we all share as Canadians are supported as we welcome asylum seekers. We will always go about this properly. We will always ensure that the rules are being followed. We will always be there to welcome those who are fleeing violence and terror in the world, in accordance with our values.

#27
Mr. Pierre Paul-Hus CPCCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles
8.0

Paul-Hus asks the Prime Minister to identify the owner of the land near chemin Roxham and disclose how much taxpayers are paying for it, clarifying the question has nothing to do with asylum seekers.

Paul-Hus narrows the question further by distinguishing Roxham from Lacolle and making clear the ask is purely about the contract (who is the owner, how much are taxpayers paying), giving it high specificity.

Source text
Mr. Pierre Paul-Hus

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, comme on peut le voir, le premier ministre ne rĂ©pond pas du tout Ă  la question. Ma question n'a aucun rapport avec les demandeurs d'asile. La question est clairement une question de contrat. On connaĂźt les contrats donnĂ©s Ă  M. Guay dans le secteur de Lacolle. Deux kilomĂštres plus loin, il y a un secteur qui s'appelle Roxham. À cette entrĂ©e, il y a un terrain et le gouvernement du Canada paie, on ne sait pas combien de dollars Ă  on ne sait pas qui. Est-ce que le premier ministre peut nous dire qui est le propriĂ©taire du terrain et combien nous, les payeurs de taxes, payons pour ce petit bout de terrain?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, as we can see, the Prime Minister is not answering the question. My question has nothing to do with asylum seekers. The question is clearly about a contract. We know about the contracts awarded to Mr. Guay in the Lacolle sector. Just two kilometres away, there is a sector known as Roxham. The crossing is located on a piece of land and the Government of Canada is paying who knows how much to who knows who. Can the Prime Minister tell us who owns the piece of land and how much we, the taxpayers, are paying for this little piece of land?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.0

Trudeau assures the House that contracts related to chemin Roxham were awarded by civil servants following principles and rules, but provides no names, amounts, or further detail.

Trudeau asserts that contracts related to chemin Roxham were awarded by civil servants following rules and principles, which partially engages the question but provides no names, amounts, or substantive detail.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le Président, je veux assurer à tous les députés à la Chambre que les contrats en lien avec le chemin Roxham ont été accordés par des fonctionnaires en fonction de nos principes et avec toutes les rÚgles en place. Les contrats sont toujours faits en suivant les rÚgles et nous allons toujours nous assurer de cela.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, I want to assure all members of the House that contracts pertaining to Roxham Road were awarded by public servants according to our principles and all the rules in place. The rules are always followed when awarding contracts and we will always ensure that that is the case.

Natural Resources
#28
Ms. Kristina Michaud BQAvignon—La Mitis—Matane—MatapĂ©dia
5.0

Michaud asks whether the Deputy Prime Minister or the Conservative leader said Canada must produce natural gas or the market will be monopolized by polluting dictatorships like Putin's, implying both said the same thing and challenging the government's fossil fuel export acceleration.

Michaud poses a creative riddle format to highlight alleged alignment between the Deputy Prime Minister and the Conservative leader on fossil fuel exports, which has rhetorical flair but an identifiable underlying policy ask about accelerating fossil fuel projects.

Source text
Ms. Kristina Michaud

Monsieur le Président, la vice-premiÚre ministre a annoncé que le Canada va accélérer les projets énergétiques pour exporter plus de pétrole et plus de gaz vers l'Europe. Les libéraux instrumentalisent la guerre en Ukraine pour produire et vendre encore plus d'énergie fossile en pleine crise climatique. C'est une belle gang de champions. J'ai une devinette pour le premier ministre. Qui a dit ceci la semaine derniÚre: « La guerre en Ukraine montre que si le Canada ne produit pas le gaz naturel, le marché sera monopolisé par les dictatures polluantes comme celle de Poutine »? Est-ce que c'est la vice-premiÚre ministre à Washington ou le chef des conservateurs à La PocatiÚre?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, the Deputy Prime Minister announced that Canada will fast-track energy projects to export more oil and gas to Europe. The Liberals are exploiting the war in Ukraine to produce and sell even more fossil fuels in the midst of a climate crisis. What a real bunch of winners. I have a guessing game for the Prime Minister. Who said the following last week, “The war in Ukraine shows that if Canada does not produce natural gas, the market will be monopolized by polluting dictatorships like Putin's”? Was it the Deputy Prime Minister in Washington or the Conservative leader in La Pocatiùre?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.5

Trudeau says Russia's illegal invasion changed the energy situation for Europe and that Canada is helping with the global energy crisis while accelerating the transition to renewable energy and decarbonizing its energy sector.

Trudeau acknowledges Russia's illegal invasion changed the energy situation for Europe, says Canada is helping with the energy crisis while accelerating the green transition, but does not address the alignment between the Deputy Prime Minister's and Conservative leader's positions that was at the core of the question.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, l'invasion illĂ©gale de la Russie en Ukraine a changĂ© la donne pour Ă©normĂ©ment de gens en Europe qui ont besoin d'Ă©nergie pour cet hiver et pour les hivers Ă  venir. Le Canada est lĂ  pour aider Ă  la situation de crise mondiale Ă©nergĂ©tique causĂ©e par la Russie. Nous sommes aussi avec nos partenaires europĂ©ens en train d'accĂ©lĂ©rer cette transition vers de l'Ă©nergie renouvelable. C'est pour cela que nous avons tant investi dans le virage vert, ici, au Canada. C'est pourquoi nous sommes en train d'accueillir les investisseurs qui dĂ©carbonisent notre secteur Ă©nergĂ©tique pour que nous puissions ĂȘtre des leaders comme fournisseur d'Ă©nergie dans un monde carboneutre.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine was a game changer for a lot of people in Europe who need energy this winter and in winters to come. Canada is there to help deal with the global energy crisis caused by Russia. We are also working with our European partners to try to fast-track the transition to renewable energy. That is why we have invested so much in the green transition here in Canada. That is why we are welcoming foreign investors who decarbonize our energy sector so that we can be leaders in supplying energy in a net-zero world.

#29
Ms. Monique Pauzé BQRepentigny
5.5

PauzĂ© asks whether the Prime Minister finds it embarrassing that his new doctrine—including the Deputy Prime Minister's call to sacrifice national political capital to accelerate energy projects—is exactly the same as the Conservative leader's position.

Pauzé quotes the Deputy Prime Minister's specific phrase about sacrificing national political capital and asks whether the Prime Minister finds it embarrassing that his government's doctrine matches that of the Conservative leader, making it a pointed but rhetorical question.

Source text
Ms. Monique Pauzé

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, la bonne rĂ©ponse c'Ă©tait le chef conservateur Ă  La PocatiĂšre. Je comprends le premier ministre d'ĂȘtre un petit peu mĂȘlĂ© parce que la vice-premiĂšre ministre a dit exactement la mĂȘme chose Ă  Washington. Les libĂ©raux et les conservateurs disent la mĂȘme affaire. La vice-premiĂšre ministre a mĂȘme dit que le Canada doit sacrifier du capital politique national pour accĂ©lĂ©rer les projets Ă©nergĂ©tiques. En d'autres mots: tant pis pour l'opinion des citoyens, tant pis pour l'opinion des peuples autochtones, tant pis pour les changements climatiques, le Canada a du gaz Ă  vendre. Est-ce que le premier ministre trouve gĂȘnant que sa nouvelle doctrine soit exactement celle du chef des conservateurs?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, the correct answer was the Conservative leader in La PocatiĂšre. I understand that the Prime Minister might be a little confused, considering that the Deputy Prime Minister said the exact same thing in Washington. The Liberals and the Conservatives are indistinguishable. The Deputy Prime Minister even said that Canada must expend domestic political capital to fast-track energy projects. In other words, never mind what the public thinks, never mind what indigenous communities think, never mind climate change. Canada has gas to sell. Does the Prime Minister find it embarrassing that his new doctrine is exactly the same as the Conservative leader's?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.0

Trudeau says for seven years his government has demonstrated that the economy and environment must go together, citing unprecedented investments in energy transition, carbon pricing, and targets for 2030 and net zero by 2050.

Trudeau argues that for seven years the government has shown the economy and environment must go together, citing investments in energy transition and carbon pricing, but does not address the convergence with Conservative doctrine or the Deputy Prime Minister's comment about sacrificing political capital.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le Président, depuis sept ans, nous avons démontré que nous comprenons trÚs bien que l'économie et l'environnement doivent aller de pair. C'est pour cela que nous sommes en train d'investir des sommes sans précédent dans cette transition énergétique. C'est pourquoi nous sommes en train d'aider à la décarbonisation de nos sources d'énergie. C'est pourquoi nous sommes en train de mettre un prix sur la pollution partout au pays pour nous assurer que les industries et les entreprises font les investissements nécessaires pour que nous atteignions nos cibles de 2030 et la carboneutralité en 2050. Nous allons continuer de mener en matiÚre d'environnement parce que c'est bon pour l'économie.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, for the past seven years, we have demonstrated that we know full well that the economy and the environment must go hand in hand. That is why we are investing unprecedented amounts in this energy transition. That is why we are helping to decarbonize our energy sources. That is why we are putting a price on pollution across the country. We want to make sure that industries and businesses make the investments needed for us to reach our 2030 targets and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. We will continue to be a leader on the environment because it is good for the economy.

The Economy
#30
Tim Uppal CPCEdmonton Mill Woods
3.5

Uppal asks the Prime Minister how much more it will cost Canadians to celebrate Bandi Chhor Divas and Diwali under his homegrown inflation crisis, noting grocery prices have not risen like this in 40 years.

Uppal references a 40-year high in grocery prices and upcoming cultural celebrations (Bandi Chhor Divas and Diwali) but the ask about how much more it will take to celebrate is rhetorical and unanswerable rather than a genuine policy question.

Source text
Tim Uppal

Mr. Speaker, we have not seen grocery prices rise like this in the last 40 years. Last week many Canadians struggled to afford Thanksgiving dinner with their families, all because of the Prime Minister's inflation crisis. Next week is Bandi Chhor Divas and Diwali. Can the Prime Minister please tell Canadians how much more it will take to celebrate the festival of lights under his homegrown inflation crisis?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
4.5

Trudeau says the government is delivering a doubling of the GST credit for the next six months and asks Conservative MPs to convince their leader to support dental care for children under 12 and rental support for low-income Canadians.

Trudeau references the doubling of the GST credit for the next six months and pivots to challenging Conservatives to support dental care and rental support legislation, which is tangentially related to affordability but does not address grocery prices or the Diwali/Bandi Chhor Divas context.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, I have heard across the country, in farms, grocery stores and community centres from one end of the country to the other, that people are facing challenges with the rising cost of living, which is why we are delivering a doubling of the GST credit for the next six months this fall and why we are pleased that Conservative MPs were able to convince their leader to reverse his initial objection to that proposal and support it. Now, I would ask members of the Conservative caucus to convince their leader to support dental for Canadians with kids under 12 and supports for rental for low-income Canadians.

Taxation
#31
Tim Uppal CPCEdmonton Mill Woods
3.5

Uppal asks the Prime Minister to commit to stopping and cancelling his planned tax hikes on Canadians, citing food bank reliance and home heating costs.

The question references real affordability concerns (food banks, home heating) but the ask to 'stop and cancel his planned tax hikes' is broad and rhetorical rather than tied to a specific policy document or timeline.

Source text
Tim Uppal

Mr. Speaker, what he is not telling us is that the vast majority of Canadians will not even qualify for those programs and it will just make the situation worse. The fact is that many Canadians are worried about heating their homes this winter, and too many are relying on the food bank to support their family, which is a decision no Canadian family should have to make. The last thing Canadians need is for the Prime Minister to triple the carbon tax, making everything more expensive. Will the Prime Minister commit to stopping and cancelling his planned tax hikes on Canadians?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau pivots to accusing Conservatives of not supporting cost of living relief measures such as the extra $500 housing benefit and dental support for children.

The Prime Minister deflects entirely by turning the question around on the Conservatives for not supporting cost of living relief measures, never addressing the carbon tax question asked.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, there we have it. The Conservative Party just admitted it is not supporting our cost of living relief measures because it is afraid they will make things worse. Canadians do not need excuses from Conservatives. They need Conservatives to step up and support direct support for low-income renters, with an extra $500 on top of the Canada housing benefit to be delivered to them, and support families who cannot afford to send their kids to the dentist. These are things that will touch millions of Canadians. Why are the Conservatives not there to support them? Canadians do not want excuses; they want support.

#32
Mrs. Dominique Vien CPCBellechasse—Les Etchemins—LĂ©vis
5.5

Vien asks the Prime Minister to commit to abandoning planned tax increases on January 1, citing food prices up 11.4%—the largest increase since 1981—and broader affordability hardships facing Canadians.

Vien cites a specific statistic (food prices up 11.4%, the largest increase since 1981) and asks a pointed question about whether the PM will commit to abandoning the January 1 tax increase, giving it some factual grounding.

Source text
Mrs. Dominique Vien

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, comme l'ont rappelĂ© plusieurs de mes collĂšgues aujourd'hui, le prix des aliments a augmentĂ© de 11,4 % par rapport Ă  l'an dernier. C'est la hausse la plus marquĂ©e depuis 1981. Les Canadiens ont de la difficultĂ© Ă  se nourrir, Ă  se vĂȘtir et Ă  chauffer leur maison. Avec NoĂ«l qui approche, on peut se demander quel genre de temps des FĂȘtes les Canadiens vont passer. Le premier ministre s'entĂȘte et continue de vouloir prendre encore plus d'argent sur le chĂšque de paie des Canadiens. Peut-il s'engager aujourd'hui Ă  renoncer Ă  renoncer Ă  augmenter les taxes le 1er janvier prochain?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, as several of my colleagues pointed out today, the cost of food is 11.4% higher than it was last year. Prices have not gone up that much since 1981. Canadians are struggling to buy food and clothing and heat their homes. Christmas is coming. What kind of holiday are Canadians going to have? The Prime Minister is bound and determined to take even more money off Canadians' paycheques. Will he commit to cancelling his plans to raise taxes on January 1?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau accuses Conservatives of not supporting relief measures for low-income renters and families who cannot afford dental care for children under 12, without addressing the January 1 tax question.

Trudeau does not address the January 1 tax increase question at all, instead pivoting to accusing Conservatives of not supporting relief measures for low-income renters and dental care.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le Président, si le Parti conservateur était réellement préoccupé par la hausse du coût de la vie pour les Canadiens, il serait en train d'appuyer nos mesures pour aider les Canadiens qui en arrachent le plus, les locataires à faible revenu qui ont besoin d'un peu plus d'aide pour payer leur loyer cet automne ou les familles qui ont des enfants de moins de 12 ans, mais qui ne peuvent pas payer les soins dentaires pour ces enfants. Je sais que ce n'est pas la solution qui va tout changer, mais c'est de l'aide concrÚte qui va aider énormément de familles à en avoir un peu plus ce Noël. Pourquoi est-ce que ces conservateurs refusent d'appuyer des familles qui en ont besoin?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, if the Conservative Party were really concerned about the rising cost of living for Canadians, it would support our measures to help Canadians who are struggling the most, low-income renters who need a bit more help to pay the rent this fall, and families that cannot afford dental care for their children under the age of 12. I know these measures will not change everything, but they will definitely help a lot of families have a merrier Christmas. Why are the Conservatives refusing to help families in need?

Small Business
#33
Ms. Anju Dhillon LibDorval—Lachine—LaSalle
0.5

Dhillon asks the Prime Minister to remind Canadians how the government has supported small businesses.

Dhillon's question is a classic softball government-backbench setup asking the Prime Minister to 'remind Canadians' how the government has supported small businesses, with no accountability dimension.

Source text
Ms. Anju Dhillon

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, depuis le premier jour, notre gouvernement a toujours Ă©tĂ© lĂ  pour soutenir les petites entreprises partout au Canada. Elles sont le cƓur de nos communautĂ©s et le moteur de notre Ă©conomie. C'est pourquoi il est essentiel que nous travaillions tous ensemble pour donner aux propriĂ©taires de petites entreprises le soutien dont ils ont besoin pour rĂ©ussir. Le trĂšs honorable premier ministre peut-il rappeler aux Canadiens et aux Canadiennes comment notre gouvernement a soutenu les petites entreprises?

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, our government has been there from the very beginning to support small businesses across Canada. They are the heart of our communities and the backbone of our economy. That is why it is crucial that we all work together to give small business owners the support they need to succeed. Can the right hon. Prime Minister remind Canadians what our government has been doing to support small businesses?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, j'aimerais d'abord remercier la dĂ©putĂ©e de Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle de sa question et de son travail acharnĂ©. Les Canadiens savent qui dĂ©fend vraiment les intĂ©rĂȘts des petites entreprises. Quand nous avons proposĂ© de rĂ©duire les impĂŽts pour les petites entreprises en croissance, les conservateurs ont votĂ© contre. Quand nous avons aidĂ© 1 400 petites entreprises d'Ottawa Ă  se rĂ©tablir aprĂšs la venue du convoi, le chef de l'opposition a dit qu'il Ă©tait fier des occupants. Les conservateurs refusent de soutenir correctement les propriĂ©taires des petites entreprises, mais, de notre cĂŽtĂ©, nous allons continuer d'ĂȘtre lĂ  pour les petites entreprises au pays.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, I would first like to thank the member for Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle for her question and for all her hard work. Canadians know who really stands up for small business. When we proposed a tax cut to help small businesses grow, the Conservatives voted against it. When we helped 1,400 small businesses in Ottawa get back on their feet after the convoy crisis, the opposition leader said he was proud of the occupiers. The Conservatives refuse to properly support small business owners, but we on this side of the House will always be there for small businesses in this country.

—
4.0

Trudeau references a vote to reduce taxes for growing small businesses and assistance to 1,400 Ottawa small businesses after the convoy, while criticizing the Conservative leader's support for the convoy.

Trudeau offers some policy references (reducing taxes for growing small businesses, helping 1,400 small businesses in Ottawa after the convoy) but largely pivots to attacking Conservative voting records.

Taxation
#34
Mr. Jake Stewart CPCMiramichi—Grand Lake
6.0

Stewart asks why the Liberals are planning to triple taxes on home heating, citing a 30% jump in New Brunswick heating oil costs in the last month and half of Atlantic Canadians living in energy poverty.

Stewart cites specific regional data (half of Atlantic Canadians heat with oil, heating oil cost jumped 30% in the last month in New Brunswick, half living in energy poverty) and asks a direct question about tripling taxes on home heating.

Source text
Mr. Jake Stewart

Mr. Speaker, the cost of home heating just keeps going up in Atlantic Canada. Half of Atlantic Canadians are living in energy poverty. The cost of home heating oil jumped 30% in the last month in New Brunswick. Half of Atlantic Canadians heat with oil and are facing a cold, bitter winter because of the Liberal government. Today's numbers confirm that Liberal inflation is up again for groceries and housing back home. With the affordability crisis devastating Atlantic Canadian families, why are the Liberals planning to triple taxes on home heating?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
2.0

Trudeau does not address the tripling of taxes on home heating and instead asks why Conservatives won't support cheques to low-income renters and $1,300 in dental support for families.

Trudeau ignores the specific Atlantic Canada heating oil data and the question about tripling taxes, instead redirecting to why Conservatives won't support cost of living relief measures.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, again, all in this House are concerned about the rising cost of living faced by Canadians in Atlantic Canada and indeed across the country, so the question we all have is this: Why are Conservative politicians not supporting our cost of living relief measures? Why are they not stepping up to send cheques to the lowest-income renters, which will support close to two million Canadians who are going to have trouble paying rent this winter? Why are they not sending support to families who cannot send their kids under 12 to the dentist? We are talking about $1,300 that is going to help families over the next couple of years. The Conservatives say they care, but they do not stand up for them.

#35
Mrs. Shelby Kramp-Neuman CPCHastings—Lennox and Addington
5.0

Kramp-Neuman asks when the Prime Minister will cancel his plan to triple taxes on gas, groceries and home heating, citing food prices up 11.4%—the largest increase in 41 years.

Kramp-Neuman cites the specific 11.4% food price increase and the 41-year record, then asks when the PM will cancel the plan to triple taxes on gas, groceries and home heating, but frames it with heavy rhetorical language ('everything is broken').

Source text
Mrs. Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Mr. Speaker, this morning, media reports indicated that food prices are skyrocketing. Up by 11.4% this month, it is the largest increase in 41 years. Everything is broken, and the government's carbon tax makes the already unbearable even worse. Instead of the Liberals driving up prices and sending Canadians deeper in debt, we need less talk and more decisive action from the government now. When will the Prime Minister cancel his plan to triple taxes on gas, groceries and home heating?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.0

Trudeau asserts that the price on carbon pollution returns more money to most Canadian families than they pay, and asks why Conservatives won't support relief for low-income renters and families who can't afford dental care.

Trudeau offers a partial factual counter-claim that the price on carbon pollution returns more money to most families but does not address the specific tripling question or the food price data cited.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, as the members opposite well know, our price on carbon pollution returns more money to most Canadian families in the areas in which it is imposed. The reality is that we are stepping up to support Canadian families across the country, including with our cost of living relief package. The question that many Canadians have is this: Why are Conservative politicians not there to support our measures to deliver help to low-income renters and families who cannot afford to send their kids to the dentist? These are things that matter to Canadians, yet the Conservatives are standing in the way.

#36
Mr. Fraser Tolmie CPCMoose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan
4.5

Tolmie asks the Prime Minister to cancel plans to triple the tax on home heating and axe the tax on tax, framing it around veterans facing a tax on a carbon tax on their heating bills this Remembrance Day.

Tolmie frames the question around veterans paying GST on top of a carbon tax ('a tax on a tax on a tax') and asks the PM to cancel plans to triple the tax on home heating, but the framing is more rhetorical than data-driven.

Source text
Mr. Fraser Tolmie

Mr. Speaker, this upcoming Remembrance Day, veterans across Canada will be thanked for their service by being charged GST on top of a carbon tax on their heating bills, which is a tax on a tax on a tax. Heating a home during winter is a necessity. Why will the Prime Minister not cancel his plans to triple his tax on home heating and axe his tax on tax?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.5

Trudeau disputes what he calls Conservative misinformation by asserting that more money is returned to 80% of families than they pay in carbon price, and notes that increasing the carbon price gives predictability signals to businesses.

Trudeau responds with a factual counter-claim that 80% of families get more money back than they pay, and offers a rationale about investment signals to businesses, but does not address the specific GST-on-carbon-tax point or veterans.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, despite Conservative misinformation, the reality is that with our price on carbon pollution, more money is returned to 80% of families in the areas in which it is imposed than they pay in these taxes. That is a fact that Conservatives have been avoiding. As the carbon price increases to give predictability signals to businesses to continue to invest in reducing their emissions, Canadians keep getting more money back. We are going to continue to deliver for Canadians. We are going to continue to stand up to support Canadians who need it.

Labour
#37
Ms. Lisa Hepfner LibHamilton Mountain
1.0

Hepfner asks the Prime Minister to update the House on what the government is doing to eliminate the use of replacement workers during strikes and lockouts.

Hepfner's question is a government-backbench softball asking the PM to update the House on eliminating replacement workers during strikes and lockouts, with partisan framing about the Conservative leader's anti-worker record.

Source text
Ms. Lisa Hepfner

Mr. Speaker, the government is committed to the collective bargaining process to protect workers’ rights, pay and power. One of the first things we did after we formed government was to repeal Conservative anti-worker legislation that made it harder for unions to fight for workers, legislation the Leader of Opposition supported. Hamilton labour leaders tell me they were relieved and grateful that our government took this swift action. Can the Prime Minister update the House on what our government is doing to eliminate the use of replacement workers during strikes and lockouts so workers have more power and fairness at the negotiating table?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the member for Hamilton Mountain for her hard work and her constant advocacy for workers. As a cabinet minister in the Harper years, the Conservative leader actively supported anti-union legislation, such as Bill C-525 and Bill C-377, and he is still attacking supports for workers today. Today, our government launched consultations on eliminating the use of replacement workers during strikes and lockouts. This government will always be on the side of workers, while the Conservative leader gatekeeps Canadians out of safer, good paying jobs.

—
5.5

Trudeau announces that the government launched consultations today on eliminating the use of replacement workers during strikes and lockouts, while also criticizing the Conservative leader for supporting Bill C-525 and Bill C-377.

Trudeau announces that the government launched consultations on eliminating the use of replacement workers during strikes and lockouts, which is substantive new information, though wrapped in partisan attacks on the Conservative leader.

Housing
#38
Ms. Lori Idlout NDPNunavut
6.5

Idlout asks when the government will act on the housing crisis in Nunavut to save lives, citing the case of a young pregnant woman in Kugaaruk who completed suicide after being turned away from housing due to unavailability.

Idlout grounds the question in a specific, tragic case from Kugaaruk and identifies a clear accountability gap—housing boards being unable to house a young pregnant woman who subsequently died by suicide—making it a pointed ask about when the government will act.

Source text
Ms. Lori Idlout

Uqaqtittiji, when I visited Kugaaruk, I was told of the consequences that housing boards face when they say no to an applicant. One decision resulted in turning away a young pregnant woman because there were no houses available. In hopelessness, she completed suicide. The housing board suffers with this decision while the government continues to fall short on meeting the housing needs in Nunavut. When will the government finally take on the burden that Nunavummiut face every day and act on the housing crisis to save lives?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
5.0

Trudeau says the government is working in direct partnership with Premier Akeeagok on housing investments in the north and acknowledges that more needs to be done, but offers no specific commitments or timelines.

Trudeau expresses sympathy and references working in direct partnership with Premier Akeeagok on housing investments in the north, but provides no specific commitments, timelines, or figures, and acknowledges more needs to be done without explaining how.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, our hearts break as we hear stories like that. Obviously, it is unacceptable. That is why we are continuing to step up, including working in direct partnership with Premier Akeeagok to ensure we are delivering housing investments in the north. We know the needs are great, and we know we need to continue to step up. We have strong programs and big investments going in, but we need to do more. We recognize that. We will be there.

Persons with Disabilities
#39
Mr. Mike Morrice GPKitchener Centre
7.5

Morrice asks the Prime Minister to commit to funding the Canada disability benefit by budget 2023, noting that MPs unanimously voted the day before to move the Canada disability benefit act to committee.

Morrice references a specific legislative milestone (unanimous House vote to move the Canada disability benefit act to committee), identifies a concrete funding gap, and asks a clear, time-bound question about whether the benefit will be funded by budget 2023.

Source text
Mr. Mike Morrice

Mr. Speaker, yesterday, MPs from all parties unanimously voted to move the Canada disability benefit act to committee, following the calls of disability advocates across the country. While this is an important milestone, nothing changes for Canadians with disabilities until the benefit is actually funded. People with disabilities living in poverty desperately need us to get this done. Will the Prime Minister commit today to funding this benefit by budget 2023?

Right Hon. Justin Trudeau LibPrime Minister
3.0

Trudeau acknowledges unacceptably high levels of poverty among Canadians living with disabilities and says the government is moving forward with the legislation, but does not commit to funding it by budget 2023.

Trudeau acknowledges the problem of poverty among Canadians living with disabilities and commits to pursuing the legislation but does not address the specific ask of committing to fund the benefit by budget 2023.

Source text
Right Hon. Justin Trudeau

Mr. Speaker, we know that Canadians living with disabilities face unacceptably high levels of poverty. We know how much important work there is to continue to do. That is why we have moved forward, over the past number of years, with historic steps in the right direction. We agree entirely. There is much more to do. That is why we are pursuing these important measures. We are moving forward with this legislation, and we are going to continue to be there to ensure that we are supporting Canadians living with disabilities, so they can fully participate in all the ways all of us need them to be able to do if we are going to be the country that we want to be.

Bill Blaikie
#40
Tribute Not a question-and-answer exchange — not scored.

Kevin Lamoureux (Lib) delivered a tribute on behalf of the Liberal caucus to the late Bill Blaikie, highlighting his 29 years of parliamentary service, his role in developing the Canada Health Act, his work as Deputy Speaker, his deep connection to constituents in Winnipeg—Transcona, and his later career as Manitoba's minister of conservation, concluding with condolences to his wife Brenda and his family.

Spoken by
  • Lib Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
Source text
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to offer condolences on behalf of the Liberal caucus. Bill Blaikie was an individual who accomplished a great deal in many different ways. He has, in fact, been an inspiration. When I think of politicians in Manitoba, he was second to no other in being able to transcend partisan politics. Yes, he could be partisan at times. I was at the unfortunate end of that, I must say, on one occasion in particular early in my political career, but that is for another day. There are individuals in Manitoba, whether Conservative, New Democrat, Liberal or of any other political affiliation, who look to Bill Blaikie as an inspiration, as someone who understood the principles of what it meant to be a parliamentarian. Our first responsibility is to our constituents, and Bill Blaikie demonstrated just how important that was. In the 1993 federal election when the NDP was reduced to nine seats, he was a survivor. In fact, I believe he was the only New Democrat elected east of the province of Saskatchewan. I would argue the reason for that was that he had established himself as a constituency person, someone who understood the needs of those who worked at CN Rail and in the many different businesses and occupations of the people he served. That is why he survived back in 1993. We often think that, if parliamentarians are in government, they can potentially become a minister, but, in opposition, the best a member can be is a critic. I would suggest that it does not matter where members sit in the House of Commons, whether on the government side or the opposition side, and Bill Blaikie demonstrated that. He demonstrated that in the roles he held in the House, whether it was as deputy leader when he came in second to Jack Layton back in the 2003 leadership convention or when he was the health care critic. We all talk about the Canada Health Act of 1984 and how important that was to our nation, and still is today. Bill Blaikie played a critical role in the development of the Canada Health Act. It is what we make of the positions we are assigned as parliamentarians that determines how much we will enjoy this and how successful we are going to be at implementing it. That is something Bill Blaikie demonstrated so well. I look to Bill Blaikie as someone who inspired many. The Speaker referred to his attitude when he was Deputy Speaker under Speaker Milliken. Many members may not know, though the member for Elmwood—Transcona would know, but after leaving Ottawa, he was recruited as the candidate for the NDP in the Elmwood riding. He won and later became the minister of conservation. In one year, four or five provincial parks were established. He loved nature. I believe he was an avid canoeist. He was able to accomplish a great deal even when he left the House of Commons. He was a parliamentarian, first and foremost. That is when I got to know Bill Blaikie, primarily because he was also the government House leader. It is no surprise that I was part of the House leadership team back then. We had lots of discussions and negotiations and his years in opposition gave him a better appreciation even of individuals in the Liberal Party back then when it did not have party status, and I respected that of the late Mr. Blaikie. There is so much more that I could say, but suffice it to say that William Alexander Blaikie was appointed to the Order of Canada in November 2020 for his lifelong contributions to parliamentary service and for his steadfast commitment to progressive change and social activism. On behalf of the Liberal caucus, we extend our condolences to his wife of almost 50 years Brenda, his four children, his grandchildren and the many friends and family members who were touched by his life.

#41
Tribute Not a question-and-answer exchange — not scored.

Members from the CPC, Bloc Québécois, NDP, Green Party, and Bill Blaikie's son Daniel Blaikie (NDP) delivered tributes to the late Bill Blaikie, a 29-year parliamentarian and NDP leader who passed away recently. Speakers from all parties remembered him as a towering parliamentarian, a United Church minister rooted in the social gospel tradition, a champion of the Canada Health Act, an avid canoeist and piper, the founder of Parliament Hill's annual Robbie Burns nights, and a devoted husband, father and grandfather, with all extending condolences to his wife Brenda, his children and his grandchildren.

Spoken by
  • CPC Mr. James Bezan
  • BQ Mr. Louis Plamondon
  • NDP Mr. Jagmeet Singh
  • GP Ms. Elizabeth May
  • NDP Mr. Daniel Blaikie
Source text
Mr. James Bezan

Mr. Speaker, it is a privilege to rise today and pay tribute to a former colleague and veteran parliamentarian, the Hon. Bill Blaikie, who recently passed away. Bill was first elected to this place in 1979 and served continuously for 29 years. When I and others in this chamber were first elected back in 2004, the dean of the House was Bill, a position he held in the 38th and 39th Parliaments. As we know in this chamber, the esteemed roles of Speaker and Deputy Speaker are normally shared between the governing party and the official opposition. However, because Bill epitomized what being a parliamentarian meant, he was respected right across party lines and throughout this entire House. He was appointed in 2006 as Deputy Speaker, as mentioned, serving with Speaker Milliken. He made some incredible rulings and ran the House very efficiently. Our House leader, the member for Regina—Qu'Appelle, was appointed at that time as Assistant Deputy Speaker at the tender age of 26 and worked closely with Bill. I have a fun fact: When Bill was first elected to the House of Commons in 1979, the member for Regina—Qu'Appelle was just two days old. Bill was a devoted parliamentarian, a former House leader and a Deputy Speaker. Bill's reverence for the institutions of Parliament is something we will always remember about him. When I first met Bill, he was literally bigger than life, towering over almost all of his colleagues, with the exception of six-foot-seven Brian Pallister, the former premier of Manitoba, who, at the time, was the MP for Portage—Lisgar. Back in those days, the direct flights between Winnipeg and Ottawa were done on either Dash 8s or the little CRJ jets. I can say that it was almost impossible for Bill to bend over enough to get into the airplane and walk down the aisle, never mind to fit into the extremely tight seating. I found it very uncomfortable, but Bill never ever complained. It was on those trips back and forth between Ottawa and home that I was able to get to know Bill. I was surprised to learn that he had been a member of the Progressive Conservative Party. He was a young Conservative in high school and his early days in college. That is why I think he was so reasonable and he could always appreciate our side of the debate. It was also on those trips, because of his long service and that I knew when he first started in Parliament he had a young family, as I did, I would ask him for advice on how to make sure we balanced parliamentary life with our responsibilities to our families. He provided me with very sound advice. Bill also served as a reservist with the Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders of Canada and shared my passion for a strong Canadian Armed Forces. Mr. Speaker, as you and I both know, Bill was very proud of his Scottish heritage. He was one of the best pipers Canada had to offer and was instrumental in founding our annual Robbie Burns nights here on the Hill, starting back in 1988 with Speaker Fraser. I can honestly say that I have never seen a more passionate, better or comical Address to a Haggis. Bill loved performing it and we all loved watching him do it. Following his federal career here in Ottawa, Bill was asked to run provincially and served from 2009 to 2011 as Manitoba's minister of conservation and government House leader. I got to work with him again as we dealt with overland flooding along Lake Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg and Lake St. Martin in my riding. It was not just politics and Parliament that Bill respected. He was a man of faith. He revered God. The Hon. Bill Blaikie was also the Reverend Bill Blaikie, an ordained minister of the United Church. He found callings in both faith and politics. After he retired from politics, Bill accepted a position as adjunct professor of theology and politics at the University of Winnipeg. When it came to politics, as Bill said in an interview after publishing his 2011 biography, his “driving force has been the social gospel in Canadian left-wing politics”. That dynamic of persons of faith in politics, perhaps, is something that has been more common in western Canada and certainly was, once upon a time, part of the very foundation of the NDP. Bill was keen to stress, “The church and state is different than faith and politics...you notice that where the separation of church and state is very strong and constitutional that doesn’t mean there’s a separation between faith and politics because that’s something individuals bring. It’s not an institutional connection.” Bill was a worthy successor to the social gospel heritage of the NDP and its predecessor, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, which had propelled that party to many of its historical successes on the Prairies. In fact, the House leader of the official opposition told me, “If Bill had won the NDP leadership back in 2003, I probably would never have won my Saskatchewan seat in 2004.” Truth be told, if Bill was the NDP leader, my Manitoba seat would have been at risk and I may not have made it here in 2004 either. Instead, as fate would have it, Jack Layton won, which allowed our House leader and I to be Bill's colleagues in the House and, in the case of our House leader, share your chair, Mr. Speaker. Like many Conservatives and New Democrats, we hardly agreed on everything, but we certainly respected the fact that we each believed in things and acknowledged our respective principles. Bill Blaikie had a life well lived, a life dedicated to service and helping others, and for that we unite today in paying tribute and giving thanks. In closing, on behalf of my Conservative colleagues, I want to express our sincere condolences to Bill's wife Brenda, his daughters Rebecca, Jessica and Tessa, and his son, our colleague, who is carrying on Bill's legacy, the hon. member for Elmwood—Transcona. Bill will be sadly missed, but fondly remembered by all. May he rest in peace.

Mr. Louis Plamondon

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, au nom du Bloc quĂ©bĂ©cois, j'aimerais saluer la mĂ©moire de Bill Blaikie, figure marquante du Nouveau Parti dĂ©mocratique et, plus largement, de la gauche canadienne. Quand j'ai Ă©tĂ© Ă©lu en 1984, Bill Blaikie Ă©tait dĂ©jĂ  dĂ©putĂ© de Winnipeg—Transcona depuis cinq ans. Figure imposante du caucus nĂ©o-dĂ©mocrate et grand bonhomme, il dĂ©passait ses collĂšgues d'une tĂȘte au moins. Avec sa voix forte, qui portait, Bill Blaikie en imposait. Quand il parlait, le silence se faisait Ă  la Chambre. En 2011, lorsque je me suis assis dans le fauteuil de la prĂ©sidence pour ouvrir la session et prĂ©sider Ă  l'Ă©lection de la prĂ©sidence, en tant que doyen de la Chambre, j'ai eu une pensĂ©e pour lui. Avant moi, c'est Bill Blaikie qui avait accompli ce rĂŽle en tant que doyen. Avant cela, le prĂ©sident Ă©tait dĂ©signĂ©, on s'en souvient, par le premier ministre. Inutile de dire que je n'Ă©tais pas de taille. Bill Blaikie Ă©tait presque un gĂ©ant, mais j'ai essayĂ© d'avoir la mĂȘme droiture. Bill Blaikie incarnait le NPD de ses origines, un parti aux racines religieuses créé dans les Prairies. Comme Tommy Douglas, Bill Blaikie Ă©tait un pasteur, assez loin des Ă©lites urbaines branchĂ©es qui constituent maintenant la base du NPD d'aujourd'hui, mais proche du petit monde, comme il le disait. J'ai envie de dire « du vrai monde ». En 30 ans, Bill Blaikie a occupĂ© toutes les fonctions au sein du NPD: leader parlementaire, chef intĂ©rimaire, ainsi que chef parlementaire quand Jack Layton a Ă©tĂ© chef non Ă©lu. Il a aussi Ă©tĂ© vice-prĂ©sident, comme le disait le leader de la Chambre. Quand le NPD a perdu son statut de parti reconnu aprĂšs l'Ă©lection de 1993, Bill Blaikie Ă©tait lĂ  comme un Ăźlot de stabilitĂ©. Je me rappellerai toujours ses interventions musclĂ©es pour faire reconnaĂźtre son parti, qui n'avait pas 12 siĂšges Ă  ce moment-lĂ . Nous n'Ă©tions pas toujours d'accord, lui et moi. Bill Blaikie Ă©tait un centralisateur. Sa vision du Canada s'accommodait assez mal du nationalisme quĂ©bĂ©cois, voire d'un statut spĂ©cial pour le QuĂ©bec. MalgrĂ© ses 30 ans comme dĂ©putĂ© Ă  Ottawa, je ne l'ai jamais entendu dire un seul mot en français. Je lui avais d'ailleurs demandĂ© pourquoi. Sous forme d'humour, il m'avait rĂ©pondu: « J'ai trop de respect pour la langue française pour l'utiliser avec mon mauvais accent. Je laisse ça Ă  mes enfants, qui, d'ailleurs, se dĂ©brouillent trĂšs bien ». Nos affrontements se faisaient toujours dans le respect, sur le plan des idĂ©es, des valeurs, des principes. Bill Blaikie Ă©tait un homme de principe, un homme droit, un plaideur exceptionnel, trĂšs respectueux des gens qu'il cĂŽtoyait et spĂ©cialiste de la procĂ©dure. Quand il avait quelque chose en tĂȘte, il connaissait si bien sa procĂ©dure qu'il ne faut pas croire que l'amendement passait facilement. Au nom du Bloc quĂ©bĂ©cois, j'aimerais offrir mes condolĂ©ances Ă  sa famille politique, qui doit beaucoup Ă  celui qui l'a aidĂ©e Ă  traverser les tempĂȘtes au fil des ans par sa prĂ©sence rassurante. Surtout, j'offre mes condolĂ©ances Ă  sa famille, Ă  sa femme, Ă  ses enfants, en particulier Ă  son fils Daniel, qui siĂšge actuellement en tant que dĂ©putĂ© d'Elmwood—Transcona, la mĂȘme circonscription qu'avait reprĂ©sentĂ©e son pĂšre. Mon cher Bill, pour te taquiner un peu, je terminerai en citant un grand auteur français, Alexandre Dumas, qui avait dit un jour: « Les gens que nous avons aimĂ©s ne seront plus jamais oĂč ils Ă©taient, mais ils seront partout oĂč nous sommes ». Adieu, Bill.

Hansard translation: Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the Bloc QuĂ©bĂ©cois, I would like to honour the memory of Bill Blaikie, a prominent figure in the New Democratic Party and, more broadly, the Canadian left. When I was elected in 1984, Bill Blaikie had already been the MP for Winnipeg—Transcona for five years. He was a towering figure in the NDP caucus, both figuratively and literally, as he stood at least a head taller than his colleagues. With his loud, carrying voice, Bill Blaikie got noticed. When he spoke, the House went silent. In 2011, when I sat in the Speaker's chair to open the session and preside over the election of the Speaker as the dean of the House, I thought about him. Before me, it was Bill Blaikie who carried out that role as dean of the House. Before that, as members will recall, the Speaker was appointed by the Prime Minister. It goes without saying that I did not measure up. Bill Blaikie was almost a giant, but I tried to have the same upright character. Bill Blaikie was the embodiment of the original NDP, a party that grew from religious roots in the Prairies. Like Tommy Douglas, Bill Blaikie was a pastor and was almost nothing like the slick urban elites who now form the NDP's base. As he used to say, he was close to the little people, those I would describe as regular folks. In 30 years, Bill Blaikie took on just about every role within the NDP, including House leader, interim leader, as well as parliamentary leader when Jack Layton was the unelected party leader. He was also Deputy Speaker, as the House leader was saying. When the NPD lost official party status after the 1993 election, Bill Blaikie was there, like an island of stability. I will never forget his forceful interventions to get recognition for his party, which did not have 12 seats at the time. He and I did not always see eye to eye. Bill Blaikie was a centralist. His vision of Canada did not really embrace Quebec nationalism, much less a special status for Quebec. In all his 30 years as an MP in Ottawa, I never once heard him utter a single word in French. I once asked him why. He jokingly answered, “I have too much respect for the French language to use it with my bad accent. I will leave that to my children, who are managing quite well.” Our confrontations were always respectful when it came to ideas, values, principles. Bill Blaikie was a man of principle, a decent man, a powerful advocate, a person who was deeply respectful to those around him, and an expert on parliamentary procedure. When he had something in mind, he was so well versed in procedure that you better believe that the amendment would be adopted easily. On behalf of the Bloc QuĂ©bĂ©cois, I would like to offer my condolences to his political family, who owe a great deal to the man who helped them weather the storms over the years with his reassuring presence. I especially want to extend sincere condolences to his family, including his wife and children, in particular his son, Daniel, who currently serves as the member for Elmwood—Transcona, his father's former riding. To my friend Bill, to tease you a little, I will end by quoting a great French author, Alexandre Dumas, who once said that those we have loved may not be where they used to be, but they are with us always, wherever we may be. Farewell, Bill.

Mr. Jagmeet Singh

Mr. Speaker, many words have been used to describe Bill Blaikie: giant, legend, pillar. He was a giant in our movement, both in physical stature, as has been alluded to, and in his deep commitment to justice. He was a legend in the House of Commons. He held a deep respect for democracy and for the people he represented. He was a pillar of social gospel, a strongly held spiritual belief that we are called to fight against greed and to lift each other up. He was a beloved husband and father, who instilled in his children a sense of adventure, as well as responsibility to use their talents to make the world a better place. I was incredibly lucky to be able to attend Bill's memorial service in Winnipeg. It was led in the most remarkable way by his children, Rebecca, Jessica, the member for Elmwood—Transcona and Tessa. They recounted stories of a father who would spontaneously pull the car over to put the canoe in unexplored bodies of water, sometimes with unexpected but usually safe results. He was a father who could be counted on to deliver good advice and encouragement, and a father who had a passion for social justice and a deep love of nature, qualities he passed on to his children. Bill loved the communities he served, whether he was in the church, his party or his neighbourhood of Transcona. He knew that his community had its roots in the railway, and he was dedicated to protecting those jobs and making sure they could sustain families in the future. Bill understood that economic justice, social justice and environmental justice were all essential parts of our vision of a better Canada. He was a leading voice against increased globalization. He warned against the dangers of a race to the bottom where greed and profit were the priority, and people and the environment and protecting them against exploitation was seen as a barrier to free trade. Bill was also a passionate champion of our public health care system. As the NDP health critic, he was instrumental in pushing the Liberal health minister at the time, Minister BĂ©gin, to introduce the Canada Health Act to protect Canadians from having to pay for health care services. Both Bill and Minister BĂ©gin told stories of how Bill engaged in guerrilla warfare in the House to make sure the act contained the necessary protections and, as is still the case, the minister depended on this pressure from the NDP to convince her colleagues to make the legislation better for Canadians. Before it was ever fashionable, Bill was an environmentalist. He loved nature. He was an avid paddler and camper. He believed it was a part of our mission to protect the earth. In his final act of political life, as Manitoba's minister of conservation, he put these beliefs into action when he took measures to protect the boreal forest, a place that had nurtured him. Bill loved Parliament. He was the dean of the House and served as Deputy Speaker. In 2007, he was named Parliamentarian of the Year by Maclean's magazine. He was an incredible speaker, and his speeches in this place were legendary, shaming the government of the day for ignoring the needs of the most vulnerable and laying out a path to a better and fairer future. When Jack Layton was elected leader, he asked Bill to be his parliamentary leader since he did not yet have a seat in the House. Bill had finished second in that leadership race, which was a disappointment to him, but he put that aside and took on the challenge of leadership in the House, working closely with Jack, sharing his wisdom and advice with the new leader. He also loved getting to know MPs from other parties and finding common ground with people who had a different view of the world. He could be hard on members in the House while still respecting their humanity and sharing a conversation over a meal. He was fiercely proud of his Scottish heritage. Bill was one of the founders of the annual Robbie Burns night on the Hill, which he saw as another opportunity for MPs of different parties to meet each other outside of daily debate. Listening to his children tell the story of Bill's life, it was clear he found his strength in two places: his faith and his family. Bill's Christian faith informed his politics. For him, the calling to do good in the world required him to challenge injustice and those in power who allowed injustice to happen. He did not believe that the Bible should be used to justify a politics of hate and exclusion, but a politics of justice and equality. Bill loved his family. The life of a politician is not easy on families. It means long days and lots of time away from the home. Bill's wife, Brenda, was the glue that kept the family together, and it is her more than anyone we must thank for sharing Bill with the country. Bill delighted in time with his kids, being fully present for them. He made sure their time together was filled with bike rides, camping and canoe trips and sharing stories of his family and childhood in Transcona. We are so fortunate to have Bill's son, the MP for Elmwood—Transcona, in the House and in our caucus. He carries on his dad's legacy, speaking truth to power, standing up to injustice and always defending the interests of the least powerful. Like his dad, he does not suffer fools gladly, but when people win his friendship, they know he will always have their back. In his final years, Bill cherished time with his four grandsons, Robert, Owen, Noah and Emmet. Throughout his battle with cancer, he made sure to find the energy to make memories with the new generation of Blaikie kids. He took part in water pistol fights and played in the fall leaves with them just as he had with their parents. Bill made sure his grandchildren knew him and heard his amazing stories. New Democrats across the country mourn the loss of Bill Blaikie, and we are so thankful for his life. He leaves a legacy of compassion, fairness and justice. His example reminds us that we are morally required not to add to the riches of those who have the most, but to meet the needs of those who have the least. I extend my sincere sympathy to his family and our commitment that we will continue his work.

Ms. Elizabeth May

Mr. Speaker, I hope I can get through this. All of the tributes from all parties have been heartfelt. I first met Bill Blaikie in 1987. I have been honoured for 35 years to call him a friend and to love him as a colleague and as a fellow Christian warrior for the things we believe in. I knew Bill since 1987. Obviously I was not elected when Bill was here. In 1987, Bill was the environment critic for the New Democratic Party. I was a senior policy adviser in the office of the federal minister of the environment, and that is how I had the amazing honour to get to know him and work with him. I cannot tell the stories of all the adventures over the years. I am going to try to keep this brief; I will try hard. We had adventures. We marched together in the battle in Seattle, chanting, “Turtles and teamsters, together at last.” We were tear-gassed together. What is more binding than that? That is where I first met Rebecca, by the way. We were also together at the first meeting of the World Trade Organization in Singapore. I was there at the first 1988 Robbie Burns night dinner when Speaker John Fraser, with whom Bill Blaikie was a grand friend, joined Bill. I can picture Bill to this minute marching in and piping in the haggis. There was something about Bill Blaikie's legs in a kilt, and I thought, “How could he be related to oak trees?” In any case, as we have heard, he was a bear of a man with a heart as big as he was. I want to tell members one thing from being an eye witness to his talents. He had skills as an orator in this place, an enormous warrior heart, an ability to stay focused and never give up and, of course, a talent in parliamentary alchemy. I will tell one brief story. In 1987, the hot topic was trying to save the southern third of Haida Gwaii from clear-cut logging. Our champion, in the seat now held by the hon. member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley, was another dear friend we lost too soon, Jim Fulton. We were all working, and the minister of the environment no less than everyone else, to save this area. There was an opposition day motion that came forward from Jim Fulton. In those days, opposition day motions were non-votable, but we had the whole day devoted to the campaign to stop the logging and protect this area, working in concert with the Haida Nation. At one point in the proceedings, Bill got up and said to the Speaker, turning to his colleague John Fraser, who was just as much of an eco-radical as the rest of us, that there seemed to be a lot of unanimity in this place. No one had spoken against saving the area, although there were many against it. He then moved that, by unanimous consent, at the end of the debate the motion be deemed voted on and passed unanimously. There was a fair amount of uncertainty throughout the room at that moment because no one had ever tried that before. John Fraser, as Speaker, then said the words “do we have consent?” The Liberal environment critic was Brian Tobin. The minister, Tom McMillan, was in the room too, as were, of course, Bill and Jim. There was unanimity. It was deemed to have passed unanimously at the end of the day. Miles Richardson, then president of the Council of the Haida Nation, told the media that the great spirit had hovered briefly over the House of Commons that day. Those were things Bill Blaikie could do because he was universally respected and he knew his procedure. If Bill thought we could get away with it, well who knew? We did. We have heard from many members here today about his many talents and skills and where he drew his strength. Yes, it was from family. However, the social gospel is something that we do not hear about very much in this place. I went to find some of the things Bill said about it. He related that when he finished theology school he “found the prophetic tradition within the Bible, a tradition of challenging the ruling elite.” He called it this, and I proclaim the same: faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and saviour. Bill clarified that he is “our saviour from the idolatries...in the world.” Then Bill pointed his finger at the market as the “be-all, and the end-all” to which “everything is sacrificed”. Bill knew we could not serve God and Mammon at the same time. I once heard him being interviewed on CBC Radio's Tapestry, and he said that we always hear about the Christian right; let us hear it for the Christian left. The social gospel is with us because Bill will always be with us. I will never, ever stop being grateful for the chance I had to be his friend and to get to know the hon. member for Elmwood—Transcona and his sister Rebecca. I do not know Jessica and Tessa as well as I should, but I thank Brenda, his wife, for sharing him with us all these years. It is the greatest loss, but one can cherish a life well lived. I just hope heaven was ready for Bill, but we will leave that for now. He is, was and will always be a prophetic voice in Canadian politics that says we do not leave behind the downtrodden, we do not forget what it is to say we have faith and we believe that miracles are possible. Eternal rest be with him, oh Lord, and light perpetual shine upon him. May he rest in peace.

Mr. Daniel Blaikie

Monsieur le PrĂ©sident, de la part de ma mĂšre, Brenda, de mes sƓurs, Rebecca, Jessica et Tessa, ainsi de que nos familles respectives, y compris ma femme, Janelle, et nos garçons, Robert et Noah, qui sont ici Ă  Ottawa aujourd'hui, je veux remercier tous mes collĂšgues de la Chambre des communes d'avoir pris le temps d'honorer la vie et les travaux de mon pĂšre ici, Ă  la Chambre. I want to especially thank the members for Burnaby South, Winnipeg North, Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, BĂ©cancour—Nicolet—Saurel and Saanich—Gulf Islands for their very kind words about Dad's legacy and work in this place. Members have already heard a bit about Dad. I think it is fair to say that he was an outstanding parliamentarian, an ordained minister of the United Church of Canada, an avid canoeist and hiker, a lover of all things Celtic, a husband, a father, a grandfather and dear friend. He means the world to those he leaves behind. During his time in this place, Bill Blaikie left a lasting mark on the House of Commons and the nation. Some may know this and some may not, but as a member of the McGrath committee on parliamentary reform, he had many tales that he liked to tell around the dining room table. As a member of that committee and a long-time NDP House leader and Deputy Speaker of the House of Commons, he played a key role in developing many of the procedures that we now take for granted in this place, from electing the Speaker by secret ballot to applying votes to simply enforcing an appropriate decorum in the chamber, a task easier said than done but that he often made look easy. Incidentally, he was able to use the same sense of gravitas at home to enforce decorum. It was a very proud moment for him when, at the conclusion of his parliamentary career, his peers in this place named him parliamentarian of the year. Some alluded already to the fact that as NDP health critic in the early 1980s, he led the charge for a proper Canada Health Act. He is credited in the memoir of then health minister BĂ©gin for having paved the way for a much stronger act than the government of the day would have enacted if left to its own devices. He negotiated recognition and protection for indigenous rights into the Clarity Act. He served as parliamentary leader in the initial period of Jack Layton's leadership and was sworn into the Queen's Privy Council at that time in the context of his own and other New Democrats' advocacy for the rights of Maher Arar. In the early days of the Harper government, Bill led the negotiating team that protected the 2005 so-called NDP budget by going to what was then known as the Langevin Block to meet with the new prime minister, Harper, ensuring that hundreds of millions of dollars would go to providing housing, public transportation and post-secondary education to millions of Canadians instead of going to more corporate tax cuts. In his work, Dad was reinforced by this faith, and we have heard a bit about that already today too. It is a faith that calls us not simply to care about what happens to souls in the next life, but to care for people, all people, in this life, and manifest the love and compassion of Jesus not only through the charity of individuals, but as a matter of justice and in the rules that structure our economy and our relationships with each other and the planet. He often saw the work of the NDP as standing in the prophetic tradition and speaking truth to worldly powers too consumed by greed, convenience and other concerns that blind us to our duty to care for the earth and all its creatures. Despite the importance of his work in Ottawa, Dad was always happy to slip home as soon as he could. In fact, earlier, former government House leader Don Boudria came to meet with my mom, and Dad would often tell tales of him and Boudria figuring out, in the month of June, how to wrap up business efficiently in the House so that he could do this very thing. Then, especially in good weather, he could tie a canoe to the top of the van and zip off with one or more of his children to explore a lake or creek, usually in or on the way to Whiteshell Provincial Park, that he had been eyeing up from the highway for years and wanted to check out more closely with a paddle. He carried that wonder for the natural world into his work as a parliamentarian. He was among the first to raise the problem of global warming in the House of Commons. In his time as minister of conservation in Manitoba, he created five new provincial parks and took great care and delight in directing the maintenance and repair of Manitoba's existing parks. There are many iconic photos of Dad playing the pipes, from formal gatherings here on Parliament Hill to family gatherings down at the lake. He deeply valued tradition and family connections. Exploring and celebrating our Scottish and Irish heritage was one of the ways he connected to our family history. Growing up, Celtic music, stories and toasts featured prominently in our family gatherings. However, these things were also an important part of his public persona. The New Democrats in Winnipeg have spent many evenings on a diet of Burns poetry and reflections on the state of democratic socialism in Canada in order to support NDP MPs from Elmwood-Transcona. In fact, the member for Burnaby South had the honour of being our guest speaker on one such occasion. Dad and Tommy Douglas organized the first formal Burns dinners here on Parliament Hill, a tradition that was subsequently taken up by the Speaker. These dinners have served as an opportunity for politicians of all stripes to gather and relate to each other in positive ways too often drowned out by the more toxic personalities in the House of Commons. My sisters and I will be forever grateful for the many long conversations that lasted well into the wee hours of the morning where we got to investigate the mysteries of theology, politics and history with a master of the arts who cared for us deeply. We love you too Dad. Earlier, I mentioned Dad's fondness for Scottish culture, so I would like to finish this tribute with one of his favourite Scottish toasts: Here's tae us, Wha's like us? Damn few, And they're a' deid!